MY FRIENDS AT CAPITAL MANOR EXCEL IN A LOCAL THEATER PRODUCTION

Perspective from the 19th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

The journalistic outfit in Salem – Salem Reporter — did all of us another favor this week with a report on a theater production at Capitol Manor, the facility in Salem that houses, pardon this phrase, “old folks.”

My wife I have signed up to go there when the time is right, but even now, as “future residents,” we have a lot of friends at Capital Manor.

Now, though, the subject of this post draws on work by Salem Reporter, which provides interesting stories on-line about the Salem area community.  Good for the reporters who work there and the editor, Les Zaitz, a long-time friend, and, in his past, a recognized investigative reporter for the Oregonian newspaper.

This time, reporter Abbey McDonald spent a lot of time at Capitol Manor and came up with a long story, with photos, of the theater production of Fiddler on the Roof.

First, here is how McDonald started her story:

“Rows of wooden dining chairs lined the small stage inside Capital Manor, loaned from various homes and apartments in the West Salem retirement community.  Behind them, a hand-painted backdrop featured a village, a setting sun and the silhouette of a fiddler on the roof.

“That’s who Carolyn Van Otten is playing in the community’s first-ever theater production.  Her prop fiddle, broken and missing a few strings, came from a downtown Salem music store’s junk pile.  Her costume, like others in the play, was tailored by residents and staff.

“She opened ‘Fiddler on the Roof,’ leading the cast of 36 in through the back doors to take their place on stage for the first song, ‘Tradition.’”

For attribution, I note that much of what follows is due to the good work of McDonald and Salem Reporter, not me alone.

The cast, all over age 70, has been in rehearsals for over two months to ready four performances over a two-week period in March. 

The 1964 musical takes place in the early 1900s in a Jewish community in Russia. The main character, Tevye, is a father of five daughters who want to marry for love amid a time of political persecution.

Capital Manor is performing a specially-made version of the play for seniors, which condenses the 2.5-hour run-time into an hour by shortening songs and cutting scenes.  Actors can carry their scripts with them on stage.

“We can sing, we can remember lines and we can move around on the stage.  But not all three together,” said Jane Murch-Billings, who plays Bielke, the youngest daughter.

The production has been dubbed “recreational theater” by Music Theatre International, the company that revised the scripts.

It’s a term that Dave Votaw, who plays the lead Tevye, appreciates. The performances aren’t open to the public, and the audience will be filled by residents and their families.

Votaw, who directs the choir at Capital Manor, said it’s the largest project happening in the community.  The 40-acre property is home to about 460 people who live in a mix of homes, apartments and assisted living.

Votaw said the musical endeavor began last year, when Robert Salberg, who directs Salem’s Children’s Educational Theatre, reached out with the news that productions of Broadway shows for seniors were available.


Salberg knew the director for the job:  Deborah Johansen, who has been a theater director for 45 years.  She’s worked as a middle and high school drama teacher, at Salem’s Pentacle Theatre, and at local churches.

Due to the community’s enthusiasm, the production added costumes, more choreography and more complexity to what began as a largely stationary script-reading, she said.

“This has challenged me more than anything I’ve ever done in 45 years,” Johansen said.  “As it got more and more involved, I’m like, ‘Oh, what have I created?’”

But there’s been visible progress.  Johansen said every performance has gotten better, and everyone has gotten more confident. 

“The biggest highlight is just how enthusiastic and excited this group is,” Johansen said. “They have been a delight to work with.  Positive, so supportive of me, wanting to do their best, just really trying hard.  And I think it shows.”

Because I am not in Salem until early April, I won’t be able to see the show, though, as a future resident, I might be able to wedge my in.  There, I could see one of my wife’s and my best friends, Rosemary Wood, who has role as one of the sisters in play.

A great singer in her day, Rosemary says she is enjoying the show and credits all her friends at Capital Manor for carrying an exciting load…a first for the Manor, a piece of well-known theater, Fiddler on the Roof.

WHAT DO NUMBERS SYMBOLIZE IN THE BIBLE?

Perspective from the 19th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

The other day, one of the persons who writes the daily Links Players lesson, came up with an interesting point.

This:

“In the Bible, the number three symbolizes divine perfection, completeness, and wholeness, most notably representing the Holy Trinity (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) and appearing in significant patterns like Jesus’s resurrection on the third day, emphasizing divine power and new life.  It highlights important people, events, or concepts, signifying their fullness or importance, such as Noah’s three sons or the three temptations Jesus overcame.”

I had not recognized this until it was pointed out by the writer, Chris Herman, who leads a Links Bible Study at the golf course where I play in the winters, The Palms.  He also has as role in what’s called “Links Players International,” which seeks to plant bible study groups in golf clubs across the country.  Not only seeks, but has been successful.

It’s good work – and Herman’s analysis of the number three also is good work, prompting me to go farther to learn more about the general issue of number symbolism in the Bible.

Informed by Mr. Google, a generalization is this:

“Biblical numbers often carry symbolic, theological meaning rather than just literal value, with key numbers representing spiritual concepts such as

divine perfection (7), unity (1), and testing (40).  These patterns, often found in prophetic books like Revelation and Daniel, represent themes like completion (12), humanity (6), and creation (4). 

“Here are the most common symbolic numbers in the Bible:

  • 1:  Unity, primacy, and the oneness of God (e.g., “The Lord our God is one”).
  • 2:  Divine perfection, completeness, or the Trinity (e.g., resurrection on the third day).
  • 4:  Creation of the earth (e.g., four corners of the earth, four seasons, four winds).
  • 6:  Humanity, imperfection, or sin (man was created on the 6th day; one short of 7).
  • 7:  Spiritual perfection, completion, or totality (e.g., days of creation).
  • 40:  Testing, trials, or probation (e.g., 40 days of rain, 40 years in the wilderness).
  • 666: The number of the beast, representing ultimate human imperfection/sinful imperfection.
  • 1,000:  Implies a very large, complete, or indefinite number. 

Wow!  I didn’t know all that.

Plus, to go beyond, here is more on the number three as summarized by Herman because, as always with Links Players, there is a relationship between the Bible and golf.  Sometimes it can come across as a bit contrived, but, for me, there is good news here because the Bible is “God’s word and can be trusted”…AND golf is my favorite sport.

From Herman:

“Playing golf as a threesome is a great way to compete, have fun, and play fast.  I like playing as a foursome, but I prefer a faster pace to ‘stay in the zone.’  My patience is always tested when waiting to hit every shot on the golf course and enduring a five-hour round.

“I used to put a cross on my golf ball, but the dimples always made it look like a plus sign, so I changed it to three dots to remind me of our Triune God.

“I did an AI search about the number three and found the following:

“In the Bible, the number three symbolizes divine perfection, completeness, and wholeness, most notably representing the Holy Trinity (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) and appearing in significant patterns like Jesus’s resurrection on the third day, emphasizing divine power and new life.  It highlights important people, events, or concepts, signifying their fullness or importance, such as Noah’s three sons or the three temptations Jesus overcame.

“Jesus was raised on the third day, Jonah was in the belly of a fish for three days, an event Jesus identified as a prophetic sign of His own time in the grave.  There are three patriarchs in the Old Testament (Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob), and Jesus’ inner circle included three men, Peter, James, and John.”

Why do I focus on this?  Well, for at least two reasons:

  • First, Herman’s lesson sparked my curiosity about number symbolism in the Bible.
  • Second, learning more resulted in another way to trust the Scriptures as the inspired word of God, which works for us every day in our Christian life – my Christian life.

And, finally focusing on this reminds of my what the lead pastor at our church here in the desert, Ricky Jenkins, always says as he reads passages from the Bible – “I have just read from the greatest book ever written and I attest today that every word in it is true.”

Right!

KEY ARTICLES OF MY FAITH

Perspective from the 19th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

Given all that is happening in our world these days – wars, rumors of wars, dissension, disagreement, tension — it is important for me to outline key articles of my faith.

To be specific, my faith in God. 

I don’t know what the future holds, but I know who holds my future – God.

This is very personal – a relationship with my God.  One on one.  Not a triangle involving anyone else.

So, on with the key articles:

  • I try, without perfection, to follow God’s most prominent admonition, the “greatest commandment” – “To love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, mind, and strength; and love your neighbor as yourself.”

Matthew 22:36-40 outlines this greatest commandment:  “Teacher, which is the great commandment in the Law?” And he said to him, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.  This is the great and first commandment.  And a second is like it:  You shall love your neighbor as yourself.   On these two commandments depend all the law and the prophets.”

  •  I don’t have to earn my way to heaven to be with God for eternity.

Key Bible verses for God’s plan of salvation include John 3:16, which highlights God’s love for the world by giving His Son, and Romans 10:9-10, which details confessing Jesus and believing in His resurrection for salvation.  Other significant verses are Romans 3:23 (all have sinned), Romans 6:23 (wages of sin is death, gift is eternal life), and Ephesians 2:8-9 (saved by grace through faith). 

  • Put another way, I claim the free gift of salvation.  It is grace – “free and unmerited favor.”

Same verses as above.

  • As a result of my salvation, I should be involved in good works that benefit Christ who gets the credit for those good works when I engage in them.

Ephesians 2:10:  For we are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.

Other translations add perspective:

New Living Translation/For we are God’s masterpiece. He has created us anew in Christ Jesus, so we can do the good things he planned for us long ago.

English Standard Version/For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them.

  • I view every person in the world to be, at least potentially, a child of God, regardless of ethnicity, color of skin, country of origin, immigration status, or any other factor.  That means that, as God loves me, I should love and respect all others.

John 3:1 begins by declaring, “Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God.  This highlights the extraordinary and generous love God has for believers.” 


It is God’s great love that takes the initiative to make us the children of God.  This extravagant outpouring of our heavenly Father’s love made the apostle John marvel:  “See what great love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God!  And that is what we are!”

(1 John 3:1).

Being children of God means we have been born into God’s family.  We become God’s children through faith in Jesus Christ, which results in spiritual rebirth:  “But to all who believed him and accepted him, he gave the right to become children of God. They are reborn — not with a physical birth resulting from human passion or plan, but a birth that comes from God” [John 1:12].

Jesus taught that only the children of God experience new birth and the opportunity to see the kingdom of God [John 3:3].  When we hear the gospel message, repent and confess our sins, and believe in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, at that moment we are born into God’s family.  We become a child of God and co-heir with Christ of everything in God’s kingdom for all eternity [Ephesians 1:13–14; Romans 8:14–17].  All that God has given to His Son in the kingdom belongs to us as His children, as well.

Note that these quotes often use the word “all.”  All persons are – or at least could be – children of God.  So, there is no reason to view those who may not look and act like us with derision and disrespect.

Two examples of this equity are programs that operate within the church my wife and I attend in Salem, Oregon.  They are Salem for Refugees and Salem Free Clinics.  Both are worth supporting because they treat ALL PEOPLE as children of God.

Verses 7 through 9 in Psalm 146 underline these responsibilities:

“He upholds the cause of the oppressed and gives food to the hungry.
The Lord sets prisoners free, the Lord gives sight to the blind, the Lord lifts up those who are bowed down, the Lord loves the righteous, the Lord watches over the foreigner and sustains the fatherless and the widow, but he frustrates the ways of the wicked.

  • I eschew violence as a means to achieve anything, including in politics.

Jesus’ instruction to turn the other cheek, found in Matthew 5:39, means to turn the tables on those who seek to harm us and to overcome evil with good.  This is difficult, especially if someone exerts violence against you, as has been a hallmark of the current presidential administration.  Still, I abhor violence as any means to any end.

  • It is not possible for something inanimate, such as a country, to be Christian.  The word Christian applies to individuals.  So, is – or was – the United States a Christian country?  No.  It may have exhibited aspects of Christianity or individual citizens may have been Christians themselves, but it is just that – individual Christianity.

No Biblical reference for this.  Just my view.

In conclusion:  We should place value on gathering with God’s people for the strength and capability that results from being together with friends

— and with God. 

Matthew 18:20, underlines this very well:  “For where two or three gather together as my followers, I am there among them.”

A PUBLIC MEETING LAW MISTAKE IN THE RECENT OREGON LEGISLATIVE SESSION

Perspective from the 19th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

The mistake mentioned in this blog headline is that Oregon legislators approved a change in the state’s public meetings law that many of them knew was flawed even as they voted for it.

The “it” is House Bill 4177 that was designed to correct confusion stemming from changes in the public meeting law originally passed by lawmakers in the 2023 legislative session.

HB 4177 may have been a well-intentioned fix, but passage indicates at least two things:

  • First, it is risky in a short legislative session of only about 30 days to make a complicated changes in a long-standing law in Oregon that requires government to reach decisions in public.
  • Second, the changes made in HB 4177 could make it possible for governments to set the stage for taking action in secret.  At least opponents contend that is true.

Regarding the notion of a mistake:  The judgment is mine.

Even as I write this, let me provide this disclosure.  I am deeply aware of the issues in the public meeting controversy because I dealt with them when I served as a member of Oregon Government Ethics Commission.  My second four-year term closed at the end of December and, for the last year in office, I served as commission chair.

During that year, we dealt with complaints against many local government officials who had been alleged to have violated provisions of the 2023 law that required they not engage in “serial public meetings.”

The word “serial” refers to the fact that, if two public officials talk to each other outside of a public meeting, that conversation could ramp up into discussions by a quorum of the specific public body involved, even if the first two officials had no idea a quorum would eventually be involved.

So, in a way, as I have put, they could be trapped by a quorum.

Thus, the conundrum:  How to allow local elected officials to talk to each other without establishing a quorum in advance of a public meeting.

If it were up to me, I’d do something pretty complicated.  I would allow elected officials to talk outside of a public meeting – otherwise there is only silence – and then at the ensuing public meeting, if their conversations came to light, ask those officials to attest, perhaps even under oath, that they did not intend for a quorum to result.

Possible?  Perhaps.

Hard to administer?  Yes.

Hard to regulate?  Yes.

Legal?  Not sure.

But, outside of a better solution, either mine or someone else’s, what HB 4177 does, according to opponents, is to create loopholes that “allow public officials to discuss, deliberate, and make decisions in private, without public notice, recordings, or media awareness, thus violating the spirit of open government.”

For this reason – the prospect of government secrecy in violation of Oregon’s long-standing public meeting law – various journalists testified against the bill.  To no avail.  The Legislature still passed it.

A sidelight here.  The Ethics Commission’s jurisdiction does not routinely extend to the Legislature itself, so, there, elected officials are allowed to talk privately without any restraint, even if those private talks establish a quorum and lead to a decision in public.

At least so far, Governor Tina Kotek has not signed the bill into law and that means various interests, including journalists, are calling for her to veto it.

Who knows if a veto will occur, but even if it doesn’t and HB 4177 becomes law, there is no doubt but that the issue will come up again in the next legislative session next year as individuals on all sides of the issue look for a better fix.

Stay tuned.

AGAIN, THE HEAD OF A PIN ANALOGY

Perspective from the 19th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

As I write this, I acknowledge again that I don’t know enough about the war in Iran.

Well, apparently, neither does Donald Trump.

Thus, the “head of a pin analogy.”  What I know for sure about this war could be written on the head of a pin.  Trump also needs that pin. 

He started this war without congressional authorization or any nod to the idea that any president needs to make a case for war to all Americans, because, of course, many of them will pay a price for war, not to mention those who will lose their lives fighting Trump’s battle.

Trump is out of the control because he thinks he is a god, or at least close to one.  And he always – always – knows best, because he is the epitome of a narcissist.

For the following list of Trump foibles, I am indebted to Atlantic Magazine, which, a couple days ago, wrote a story providing details about how little Trump knows about HIS war, or about how his comments go first in one direction, then, later, in another direction.

Written by David Graham, here is how the story started:

“The Trump administration can’t say why the United States went to war with Iran, and it can’t say what the goal of the war is.  Now it can’t even decide whether the war is still going on.

“During an interview with CBS News, Trump all but declared victory.  ‘I think the war is very complete, pretty much.’

“This statement is so self-contradictory and confusing that one might be tempted to write it off as just riffing, except that he reiterated it at a press conference later.  ‘We’re achieving major strides toward completing our military objective, and some people could say they’re pretty well complete,’ he said, apparently referring to himself. “

The following are foreboding contrasts pointed out by Atlantic:

  • …the same afternoon, the Department of Defense posted on X, ‘We have only just begun to fight,’ mangling a famous quotation from John Paul Jones, the father of the U.S. Navy.  Reporters at the press conference, perplexed, asked Trump about the gap.  ‘You said the war is very complete, but your defense secretary says this is just the beginning, so which is it?’

“Well, I think you could say both,” Trump replied.

  • You could — if you were a pundit making an argument about the future of the war.  But people might hope for a bit more clarity from the man who launched the war without congressional authorization, popular support, or even much buy-in from his own advisers.
  • Trump’s equivocation yesterday may be his attempt to steady an economy shaken by the war.  The president’s approval has been battered recently by the high cost of living.  Although inflation was a major factor in his victory over Kamala Harris in 2024, Trump has seldom focused on it since entering office and has insisted that affordability is somehow both a Democrat hoax and a problem that he has already solved.
  • The war in Iran has exacerbated existing stressors:  It has driven up gas prices, rocked stock markets, and suggested that Trump’s attention is not on the economy.  The president appears rattled by this and even called on oil-tanker captains to “show some guts” and sail through the contested Strait of Hormuz.
  • Over time, however, whatever succor Trump provides to the economy by saying that the war is nearly over is likely to be canceled out by his administration’s vacillation.  Markets seek stability, and Trump can’t seem to decide on a talking point, much less a strategy or aim for the war itself.  Trump offered 10 different rationales for the war in its first six days alone.
  • Trump appears confused not only about the future of the war but also about some of its basic facts.  The U.S. has faced international criticism over a missile strike on a girls’ school in Iran, which was next to a naval base that was also struck.  Iranian authorities say that about 175 people were killed at the school, mostly children.  Over the weekend, Trump said that the attack was friendly fire.  ‘In my opinion, and based on what I’ve seen, that was done by Iran,’ he said.
  • Since then, evidence has emerged that the missile that struck the base was a Tomahawk, an American-made weapon.  Yesterday, Trump claimed that Iran possesses Tomahawks.  ‘Whether it’s Iran or somebody else, the fact that a Tomahawk — a Tomahawk is very generic,’ he said.  ‘It’s sold to other countries.’  This is nonsense:  Only a few U.S. allies, including the United Kingdom and Australia, are known to have them.

The Atlantic’s conclusion:

“No president can or should be expected to know everything. This is why he’s provided with a Cabinet and a team of other advisers, an executive branch full of subject-matter experts, and a Congress and judiciary to serve as checks on him. The problem is that Trump wants to operate with complete freedom from any restrictions and without waiting for advisers’ input.”

But Trump is not “any president.”  He doesn’t deal with reality because he is in his own little world, one he makes up on the fly.

And the fact is that all Americans are worse off for it.

IF YOU HAVE A DOG, DO YOU LIVE LONGER? PERHAPS

Perspective from the 19th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

There are benefits to having a dog, and my wife and I have experienced those benefits for many years.

That’s because we have had two dogs, both miniature poodles, and, in both cases, our lives were better because of the companions.

So it was that I borrowed the sense of this blog headline from the New York Times as a reporter there wrote under this specific headline:  Get a Dog, Live Longer?

Here is how the story started:

“Research suggests pets keep you healthier.  But there are some caveats.

“As a child, Dr. Dhruv Kazi was obsessed with dogs.  As a cardiologist and health economist, he wrote about their health benefits.  But he didn’t get one of his own until his early 40s.

“In 2019, he moved to Boston to take a job as the director of the Cardiac Critical Care Unit at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.  Then Covid hit.  Living alone and working in the intensive care unit, Dr. Kazi said the first year of the pandemic was ‘immensely isolating.’

“Everything changed in 2021 when he got Rumi, a high-energy, high-affection vizsla puppy.  Thanks to Rumi, Dr. Kazi started spending more time outside, got to know his neighbors and had a much-needed dose of ‘positive energy’ and ‘goofiness’ injected into his life.”

Dr. Kazi now says the dog played a crucial in keeping his sanity.

The Times writer goes on to say that research suggests dogs and other pets keep a person healthier.

“Studies show that having a pet is associated with lower blood pressure, a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease, and lower rates of death after a heart attack or stroke.  And a large review of studies published in 2019 found that owning a dog was associated with a 24 per cent lower risk of dying from all causes over the course of 10 years.

“The potential benefit is striking enough  when it comes to heart health that the American Heart Association even has a scientific statement devoted to it, declaring that dog ownership may be reasonable for reduction in cardiovascular disease risk.”

Regarding caveats, two come to mind.  First, there are costs to owing a dog – costs such as routine vet bills.  You also have to plan for your pets if you travel, sometimes taking them with you; other times arranging for their care while you are gone.

But the caveats don’t bother me.

As for our two dogs:

First, Hogan, a miniature poodle, gave us a lot of joy.  Then, after he went to heaven, we got another miniature from the same breeder who gave us Hogan.  In other words, they were related in some way as the breeder kept true to her line.

So, continuing to employ golf logic [my favorite sport is golf], we named the new dog, Callaway. 

Whatever is the case, Hogan first and now Callaway have been part of our family for many years.  And that is true – they are part of our family.  We wouldn’t be the same without them.

So, call my wife and me dog lovers.  We love the title, considering it an accolade.

TWO GOOD WORDS:  CIVILITY AND HUMILITY

Perspective from the 19th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

I have noted before that I am a person who likes words, more than charts, graphs or tables of numbers.

Thus, two main words in this blog headline caught my attention today as I read a piece in one of my on-line publications.

It’s called Links Players and, no, it’s not about golf.  It’s a reference to Bible study groups founded by the Links Players Group in the California desert that has now grown to more than 300 groups spread around the country in golf clubs.

I attend two of them, one in my home, Salem, Oregon, when I am there seven months of the year, and another in my winter home, La Quinta, California.

The good news in these two groups – as well as no doubt, in many others – is that Christians get together to study the Bible before heading out for another game of golf.

This time, one of the Links Players writers, Tom Berliner, is a semi-retired university dean and leadership consultant.  He wrote form his home in Tennessee and focused on this Bible verse:

“Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall,” which is found in Proverbs 16:18.

Here is how Berliner started his piece:

“The etiquette of golf is a beautiful thing to observe.  Waiting for your playing partners to take their turn, complimenting them on good shots, commiserating on the not-so-good ones, self-policing when it comes to rules, and shaking hands after the final hole are all excellent examples.

“The etiquette remains, even in the heat of battle.  Compare that with the chest-pounding, foul gestures, arguments, and what-can-I-get-away-with manipulations in so many other sports.”

Berliner is right. 

Golf is a sport with more civility and humility than most other sports.  Am I biased?  Sure.  I love golf, but I also love that it is a game where players call penalties on themselves, unusual in sports.  But it is one place where golf stands out.

Berliner goes on to note that there are many stories in the Bible that deal with pride — Adam and Eve in Genesis 3, the Tower of Babel in Genesis 11, Pharaoh in Exodus 7-12, Haman in Esther 3-7, and the prideful Pharisee in Luke 18, to name but a few.

Berliner asks, why is that?   He answers:  “Humanity’s undoing centers on pride, and God wants to encourage us to learn from these stories.”

And, then, he adds this:

“Are we genuinely helping others in a healthy way?  Do we recognize Jesus in people around us, both familiar faces and strangers?  Do we reflect on ‘What would Jesus do?’ or do we just pursue what seems good for us?”

When the word civility comes up, I often reflect on my professional life in politics when that word was beginning to go by the wayside and, after I left in retirement, I have watched it go even farther away. 

So much so that one of my favorite quotes in politics came from the late military General Colin Powell who, when he was encouraged to run for president, said he couldn’t do so because he “bemoaned loss of civility in politics.”

And, what happens in politics also happens in our everyday life.  Civility takes a back seat.

So does humility.

If all of us followed humility and civility, we’d better at golf, if not life.

IF YOU HAVE A DOG, DO YOU LIVE LONGER? PERHAPS

Perspective from the 19th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

There are benefits to having a dog, and my wife and I have experienced those benefits for many years.

That’s because we have had two dogs, both miniature poodles, and, in both cases, our lives were better because of the companions.

So it was that I borrowed the sense of this blog headline from the New York Times as a reporter there wrote under this specific headline:  Get a Dog, Live Longer?

Here is how the story started:

“Research suggests pets keep you healthier.  But there are some caveats.

“As a child, Dr. Dhruv Kazi was obsessed with dogs.  As a cardiologist and health economist, he wrote about their health benefits.  But he didn’t get one of his own until his early 40s.

“In 2019, he moved to Boston to take a job as the director of the Cardiac Critical Care Unit at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.  Then Covid hit.  Living alone and working in the intensive care unit, Dr. Kazi said the first year of the pandemic was ‘immensely isolating.’

“Everything changed in 2021 when he got Rumi, a high-energy, high-affection vizsla puppy.  Thanks to Rumi, Dr. Kazi started spending more time outside, got to know his neighbors and had a much-needed dose of ‘positive energy’ and ‘goofiness’ injected into his life.”

Dr. Kazi now says the dog played a crucial in keeping his sanity.

The Times writer goes on to say that research suggests dogs and other pets keep a person healthier.

“Studies show that having a pet is associated with lower blood pressure, a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease, and lower rates of death after a heart attack or stroke.  And a large review of studies published in 2019 found that owning a dog was associated with a 24 per cent lower risk of dying from all causes over the course of 10 years.

“The potential benefit is striking enough  when it comes to heart health that the American Heart Association even has a scientific statement devoted to it, declaring that dog ownership may be reasonable for reduction in cardiovascular disease risk.”

As for our two dogs:

First, Hogan, a miniature poodle, gave us a lot of joy.  Then, after he went to heaven, we got another miniature from the same breeder who gave us Hogan.  In other words, they were related in some way as the breeder kept true to her line.

So, continuing to employ golf logic [my favorite sport is golf], we named the new dog, Callaway. 

Whatever is the case, Hogan first and now Callaway have been part of our family for many years.  And that is true – they are part of our family.  We wouldn’t be the same without them.

So, call my wife and me dog lovers.  We love the title, considering it an accolade.

CLOSING OUT THE SHORT LEGISLATIVE SESSION IN OREGON – CALL IT “SINE DIE”

Perspective from the 19th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

In my 25 years as a lobbyist in the State of Oregon, I always relished the day when the Legislature passed a “sine die” resolution.

Say what?

It is a strange phrase, one not used in everyday conversation.

It is Latin and it means “without day,” specifically, without assigning a day for a further meeting.  It originated in the 1600s and, in this case, it means the end of a legislative session.

That’s what happened in Oregon the other day.

For me, when I was a lobbyist, it meant the end of long hours and a lot of work to represent clients before 90 legislators who gather in Salem and who sometimes see the governor who is based in Salem every day, not just during a legislative session.

So, what did this short legislative session produce and was it worth it?

Well, there usually are at least two views – one from Democrats who are in charge of both the 60-member House of Representatives and the 30-member Senate, and the other is from Republicans who are in what’s called “the minority.”

They often differ on, not only what the problems are, but what constitutes solutions.

For this report, I rely mostly on the Oregonian newspaper which produced a solid story to mark the end of the session.  By reporter Carlos Fuentes and others, it appeared under this headline:  OREGON LAWMAKERS CLOSE OUT 2026 SESSION HAVING ADDRESSED IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT, TRANSPORTATION CUTS, ARENA FUNDING

Here is how the story started:

“Oregon lawmakers ended this year’s legislative session Friday after spending five weeks addressing bills in a hodgepodge of policy areas, ranging from federal immigration enforcement and tax breaks to NBA arena funding and transportation program cuts.

“The short session did not see the level of divisive partisanship that marked 2025’s long session, with its implosion of Democrats’ planned transportation package.  But there were outbreaks of partisan bickering and grandstanding.

“Most notably, Republicans spent several weeks pushing back against Democrats’ effort to move a statewide vote on transportation tax hikes from November to May.  That prompted multiple short boycotts from the minority party and a lawsuit challenging the move.”

Here are other highlights – or, perhaps, depending on political persuasion, some observers would call some of them lowlights:

  • Lawmakers, local governments and state agencies had braced for steep budget cuts that did not materialize.  Legislative budget writers had warned of a gap as large as $750 million in the state’s two-year budget.  But ultimately they trimmed just $128 million of staffing and supplies from the $39 billion general fund following a positive revenue forecast and after Democrats pushed through tax changes that further slimmed the deficit.
  • One agency did face deeper reductions.  Lawmakers cut or redirected $290 million in services at the Oregon Department of Transportation to address the budget gap at the agency, which largely relies on its own revenue streams.

They were forced to create the plan after a referendum campaign, led by Republican lawmakers, successfully gathered enough signatures to halt tax hikes passed by Democrats last fall and place them on the ballot.

This was the issue with the deepest political disagreement.  Republicans wanted to leave the issue to voters on the general election ballot next November.  Democrats wanted to change it to the May primary election ballot – and they did.

One reason was to get the unpopular gas tax off the same ballot as Governor Tina Kotek’s re-election bid.

The move to May might stay because, immediately after the session, Republicans filed a motion in court to retain November.  So, Oregonians still don’t know when they will vote on the issue.

  • In a bi-partisan effort to ensure that the Portland Trail Blazers stay in Oregon under new ownership, lawmakers authorized issuing $200 million in state debt to upgrade the Moda Center, with an additional $165 million outlay planned for the next two-year budget.  The Moda Center is where the Blazers play home games.
  • Democrats also passed a package of bills responding to what they view as federal overreach and aggressive immigration enforcement tactics.  Those bills will allow people to sue federal agents, set protections for immigrants in hospitals and create alert notification systems when immigration authorities are on school campuses, among other things.
  • Although Democrats had pledged to make economic development a top priority for the session, they passed few bills expected to significantly boost Oregon’s ailing economic indicators.  One exception was a compromise plan that lawmakers approved on the final day of the session that will shield recreational providers, such as ski resorts, from costly lawsuits while still allowing injured people to sue under certain circumstances.
  • The most notable win for Republicans:  Democrats, in the final days of the session, agreed to gut a bill that would have made several changes to Oregon’s voter-approved gun control law and instead merely moved the measure’s effective date back to 2028 if the Oregon Supreme Court finds the law constitutional.
  • Many times during the busy session, lawmakers noted that a bill they were about to pass would require improvements in 2027.  A prime example was an update to the state’s open meetings law.  Senator Kate Lieber, a Portland Democrat, said the bill added important clarity about what elected officials can talk about with reporters, citizens and each other outside of public meetings.  But, she said, reporters and others are justified in worrying that the law will result in public business being discussed privately.
  • Democrat lawmakers entered the session with a package of bills aimed at addressing actions by President Donald Trump’s administration, ranging from increasingly aggressive federal immigration enforcement tactics to the sales of public lands and withholding of federal dollars.  One high-profile bill that passed on the final day of the session will restrict the use of masks on law enforcement officers and require them to visibly display their badge number or name and agency. Similar laws in other states have been challenged by the federal government in court.
  • For the first time ever, Oregon lawmakers took steps this year to rein in tax incentives for data centers operated by massive tech companies.

So, good or bad?  As always, both, depending on your point-of-view.

Mine focuses on the process and not as much on the results.  For what it’s worth, I opposed the move to annual sessions — the short sessions in even-numbered years.  Better to leave things as they were – the long six-month regular sessions in odd-numbered years.

That would mean legislators would have time between sessions to work on crafting middle-ground solutions to pressing problems, such as the public meeting issue mentioned above.

As it is, only partial solutions meet the light of day the short sessions and that is not a good look for persons interested in consensus, middle ground public policy decisions.

THE DEPARTMENT OF PET PEEVES IS OPEN AGAIN

Perspective from the 19th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

this department, one of five I run with a free hand to manage as I see fit, has been on hiatus for a few months.  But it is still around.

That’s because I thought of some new pet peeves, this time all of them related to golf, my favorite sport.

So, here goes:

Pet peeve #1:  Golfers who leave the flag stick ajar after they leave the hole.  That means the next players have to live with it or fix it.  Neither is a good option.

Pet peeve #2:  Golfers in power carts who don’t observe the rules for such carts.  Plus, they should just think that those who work on the course on which they play have invested time and money to put in cart paths or on focus on the health of turf.  Both are compromised when cart drivers don’t follow the rules.

A person I play golf with rarely follows the rules and he is an interesting case because he worked for years in managing city government.  There, of course, there are hosts of rules which this person would have enforced.  He should now enforce golf cart rules on himself.

Pet peeve #3:  Golfers who slam their club down or throw it after they hit a bad shot.  Better to do what good golfers, which is to move on to the next shot, illustrating the timeless golf adage:  What’s the most important shot in golf?  The next one. Plus, if you keep slamming your club on the ground, pretty soon the shaft could break with the wear and tear – and the result wouldn’t be good, either for