This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

The phrase in this blog headline refers to an unfortunate but understandable status of the game I love – golf.

Rather than admiring all of the top plays and shots in golf, today it’s all about the money.

Global Golf Post founder, editor and writer, Jim Nugent, made that point in a column he wrote for the most recent edition.

I was interested enough in his column that it prompted me to write again a about a subject I detest:  LIV, which is a professional golf tour financed by tainted money from Saudia Arabia.

For his part, Nugent bemoaned that result, but also took time over the holidays to talk to many of his contacts about the state of the golf fame.

What he did, obviously, was not conducting a scientific poll.  Rather, he collected conversations from friends and contacts, then wrote his column. 

The summary:  “I heard time and again,” Nugent wrote, “that many recreational golfers are done with the professional game and are not going to watch television coverage any longer, except, perhaps, for the majors.”

What has created this sullied reputation?

I think it is that various pro golfers – the latest is Jon Rahm who went back on his previous criticisms of LIV to take $600 million in LIV money to bolt from the PGA Tour – won’t admit that they are doing what they are doing “for the money.”

Instead, golfers like Rahm say they are joining LIV “to grow the game.”  It’s as if they are uttering a platitude from a “list of what you should say” to the media and the public when you join LIV.

Balderdash.

There is only pro who joined LIV and told like it was – Harold Varner, Jr.  He said he joined “to take the money” for the good of his family and to assure a bright, monied future for his children.

Good for Varner.

That’s honesty.

I add that, if someone offered me $600 million, I’d take it.  I just hope I would give an honest, solid reason for the action.

Meanwhile, the future of pro golf is uncertain for several reasons:

• LIV and the PGA Tour are still negotiating over a possible alliance.  The deadline to succeed came and went a couple weeks ago, but both sides say they are still talking.

• It also is not clear that two leaders on both sides – Greg Norman for LIV and Jay Monahan for the PGA Tour – have much of a future.  For my part, Norman can go away any time, given all his flamboyance to advance his personal causes.  As for Monahan, Nugent says (a) he deserves to stay because of the good he has done in the past to boost golf (including management of the Covid pandemic), and (b) because his actions in the LIV deal were done in concert with other members of the PGA Tour Board, not just himself.

• The battle over limiting golf ball distance – something not under formal consideration —  also is viewed, Nugent reports, as ignoring the interests of recreational golfers.

Finally, another uncertainty for the PGA Tour is its relationships with current corporate golf sponsors, as well as new sponsors it is trying to recruit. 

Over the last few days, a long-time sponsor, Wells Fargo, said it would continue by paying $20 million to the Tour as a way to stay involved with its sponsorship. 

The Tour said it would settle only for $25 million.  Wells Fargo bolted.

Not a smart move by the PGA Tour.

So, on and on it goes.  Dissension.  Disagreement.  Dishonesty.

For my part, I hope to be able to play the game I love and wait for at least one more pro event, the Masters, my favorite tournament of any year.   I’ll watch that; not sure about others.

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

The other day I wrote that I needed the “head of a pin” to convey all I knew about a certain subject.

Well, today, I need a new pin.

On it, I would write all I know about the Webb Telescope, the one that, far away in the heavens, sends pictures back to earth of stuff that occurred billions of years ago.  Yes, billions!

Here is the way Washington Post columnist George Will wrote about Webb in a piece that appeared under a headline that I borrowed for this blog:

“Everything began, cosmologists currently think, with a bang — the Big Bang; if it does not deserve to be a proper noun, what does? — 13.7 billion years ago.  All the material in the universe, including us, is — literally — stardust (cue Nat King Cole’s rendition), meaning residues of the explosion.  

“The light gathered by Webb’s mirrors expands our knowledge of how stars form.  And perish:  This is not going to end well.

“Launched 13 months ago, Webb is orbiting 940,000 miles away.  With its 18 mirrors and its five sunshield layers unfolded, it is a tennis-court-size engineering masterpiece.  To function, each mirror must, after being hurled into space on a shuddering rocket, retain this exquisite precision:  If each mirror were the size of the continental United States, each should not vary more than two inches from perfect conformity with the others.”

Will goes on to write using, as usually is the case, stalwart prose, and good words.

All of this called to my memory a blog I wrote a year or so ago citing an editorial writer for the Arizona Republica who composed a thought-provoking piece including this statement:

“Peering into deep outer space, images from some 13 billion years ago, stirs not only our wonderment, but also takes us on a journey of spirituality.”

The writer, Phil Boas, went on to ask this probing question:  “Did the Webb Telescope show us the face of God?”

He didn’t directly answer the question, leaving readers with the option of doing so themselves.  But he did include incredible facts in his column, which I repeat here.

• “…what a patch of sky!  It includes a massive cluster of galaxies about four billion light-years away that astronomers use as a kind of cosmic telescope.  The cluster’s enormous gravitation field acts as a lens, warping and magnifying the light from galaxies behind it that would otherwise be too faint and faraway to see.”
• Through the Webb Telescope, mankind is seeing extremely distant galaxies “that stretch back to the beginning of time.  It’s a galaxy-finding machine.”
• A lonely speck in the cosmic dark:  This is the oldest documented light in the history of the universe from 13 billion years — let me say that again — 13 billion years ago.
• A billion is a number so large it is essentially an abstraction to the human mind.  Light that has traveled 13 billion light-years requires context so we can begin to understand it – see the next bullet.  
• Light moves at a speed of 670.6 million miles per hour.  A beam of light can travel approximately 6 trillion miles in a single earth year, according to Space.com.  At that speed, you could travel around the Earth 7.5 times in a single second.
• The numbers are staggering.  Our own galaxy, the Milky Way, is about 100,000 light-years across and contains some 100-400 billion stars, according to NASA.  Its size is too big to comprehend, but, within the context of the larger universe, it is smaller than a grain of sand.
• One of our neighboring galaxies is Andromeda. It is 220,000 light-years wide.  More than twice the size of our own.
• How many galaxies do you think there are?  NASA estimates 2 trillion. And if you can wrap your brain around that, ask yourself this question:  How many planets are there in all those galaxies?
• Too many planets to comprehend:  Roughly 700 quintillion — that’s 7 followed by 20 zeroes — 700,000,000,000,000,000,000.

My mind is boggled by these statistics, not to mention the photos produced by the telescope.

In the face of these numbers and photos, my eyes glaze over, not just my mind, which raises the need for a new “head of a pin.”

Then, to regain my composure, I return to my basic premise, a choice I presume to make:   It is that God created all of what we see and cannot see  –-  and I admire his handiwork, at least what I can understand of it.

And, more good news:  We can have a personal relationship with this very big God.

Does this mean, as some have suggested, that the Webb Telescope “allows us to see the face of God?”

I say “no.”

God is too big for a telescope, even a complicated and huge one like Webb, to reckon with God.  But what the telescope has produced provides this conclusion:  A glimpse into the past – yes, billions of years ago – when God created all we see and cannot see.

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

George Will writes for the Washington Post and appears other places in a role where he analyzes politics.

He is one of the best going for three reasons:  First, he uses words very well and often I find myself having to look up one of them to make sure I know the definition (and Will is always right); second, he has a knack for going behind-the-scenes to find cases of alleged government wrong-doing; and, third, he often skewers the worst former president and wannabe future president in history,  Donald Trump.

In his current column, however, Will goes too far writing under this headline:  “A Constitution-flouting ‘authoritarian’ is already in the White House.”

In what he writes, Will compares Trump’s clear-cut sedition on January 6 to President Joe Biden’s decision to go around Congress in a particular federal appointment.

Conflating the two is beyond the pale.

Here is how Will started his most recent column.

Error! Filename not specified.

“Overcaffeinated Cassandras continue to forecast an ‘authoritarian’ and anti-constitutional Donald Trump dictatorship.  They are mistaken about the near future because, among other reasons, they misread the recent past.  Also, they are oblivious to, or at least reticent about, the behavior of Trump’s successor:  Joe Biden is, like Trump, an authoritarian recidivist mostly stymied by courts.

“When Trump wielded presidential power, he could not even build his border wall.  But next time, the fevered forecasters warn, the entire federal apparatus, which mostly loathes him, will suddenly be submissive.  Such alarmism, which evidently gives some people pleasurable frissons, distracts attention from the similarity of Trump’s and Biden’s disdain for legality.”

Will admits that “instances of Trump’s anti-constitutional behavior have been amply reported and deplored.”

But, then, he compares Trump to Biden this way:

“Biden’s, less so — although they (e.g., the eviction moratorium, the vaccine mandate, the cancellation of student debt), and judicial reprimands of them, have been frequent.  Now, consider the lack of attention to his contempt for the Federal Vacancies Reform Act, and the Senate majority’s supine complicity.”

The president, Will says, “has plenary power to nominate principal officers of the federal government without seeking prior advice from the Senate.  The Senate has plenary power to confirm — or reject — nominees, and it can somewhat condition the president’s power by stipulating certain qualifications for particular offices.”

Will goes on to recount a current event.

“Biden nominated Ann Carlson last March to be administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.  Two months later, when it was clear that the Senate would not confirm her, Biden withdrew the nomination.

“But less than five weeks after that, he named Carlson acting administrator.  His impertinence would perhaps be limited, by the Vacancies Act, to 210 days, which would expire December 26.  Furthermore, the Supreme Court has held that the act prohibits ‘any person who has been nominated to fill any vacant office from performing that office’s duties in an acting capacity.’”

After he uncovered this behind-the-scenes, situation, Will says Biden’s “indifference to these legalities is Trumpian.”

I say “no.”

Biden may try to find a way around certain laws and procedures as he did in the case Will reports.  Part of the reason he does is intransigence in Congress as Republicans, often for fun and spite, try to make life difficult for a president they don’t like.

For his part, Trump, if he rises again to the highest political office in the land, wants to overturn the country’s democracy.  He wants to be an autocrat, pardoning all those who have convicted of crimes in the January 6 insurrection, as well, if at all possible, himself.

Then, he wants all of the federal government to do his direct bidding, no matter the consequences.

I wish we had a better choice for president this time around in the presidential election, a point I have made before.

But, given the probable choice facing all of us as voters this year, I go with Biden.

*********

And this footnote:  Biden went on the attack against Trump yesterday in a clear indication that it will be Biden v. Trump in the presidential election.

Here, from the Washington Post, is an excerpt of what Biden said:

“He said other world leaders have approached him with concerns about the impact of another Trump term, and he recounted in detail Trump’s encouragement of the January 6 rioters, calling it ‘among the worst derelictions of duty by a president in American history.’  He added, ‘He still doesn’t understand a basic truth, and that is you can’t love your country only when you win.”

Good words from Biden.  I agree with him and I hope other Americans will find a way to do the same.

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

The following story appeared in the Wall Street Journal this morning and I could not help by post it as my blog.

Dogs in heaven?  Yes.

Both the author, an attorney in the East, and I in the West, say yes!

Here’s the story, with a conclusion from me.

**********

My friend Paul had to put down Bear, his beloved 11-year-old black Lab. Bear’s lungs gave out, and Paul did the humane thing, although not without, in his words, crying hard and often.  Every dog lover understands, for we know all too well how our dogs love us.

My mini bernedoodle, Sugaree, meets me at the door when she hears me on the front porch steps.  She jumps in anticipation — all four legs catching air — until I enter the hallway.  It’s a love that doesn’t diminish.

This is my welcome every weeknight when I come home from work.  I haven’t split the atom, ended world hunger or even brought her a new chew toy, yet I am honored like Pompey the Great in his third Roman triumph.

This nightly greeting has two effects on me.  First, it makes me want to be better, to be worthy of such love.  This reflection, in turn, helps me to love God, whose perfect love never ceases to draw me out from my own imperfections, from the man I am to the man I should be.

Second, it reminds me how silly it is to think I can love too many people or anyone too much.  If loving is willing the good of the other, then there is no upper limit to it.  This insight helps me strive to love my neighbor and to be an instrument of peace.  Sugaree is my role model, as Bear was Paul’s.

I like to think that this life isn’t all there was for Bear.  Years ago, Archbishop Fulton Sheen first perked up my ears, so to speak, on the spirituality of dogs.  In his autobiography, “Treasure in Clay,” Sheen wrote that during his holy hour of prayer before the Blessed Sacrament, at times he felt “like a dog at the master’s door, ready in case he called me.”

British writer C.S. Lewis went a step further in “The Problem of Pain,” in which he made a plausible case for hounds in heaven.  Lewis thought sufficient selfhood might exist in dogs and other domesticated animals that their immortality is subsumed within their master’s heavenly destiny.

For my money, though, G.K. Chesterton made the best case for dogs in heaven.  In “Orthodoxy,” Chesterton proposed that perhaps the one thing too great for God to have shown us when he walked the earth was his mirth.  What is more mirthful than the thought of a surprise party on heavenly move-in day where gathered guests include good ol’ Fido?  And who could keep such a joyful secret but someone with infinite patience?

So, chin up, Paul.  I believe you will see Bear again.  God surely has use for a creature that teaches us so much about love.

**********

AND THIS IN CONCLUSION:  One reason why I like this story is that it reminds me of my wife’s and my first dog, Hogan.  We had to put him down with a brain tumor at age 13.

It was a tough day for both of us.

But, we took some solace in thinking of Hogan romping around in the fields of heaven with other dogs that had gone upward, such as Tiger, a dog owned by our good friends who had to put him down.

Our reunion in heaven will be a great day!

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

Anyone who knows me knows that this blog headline is true for me.  I am a dog lover.

My wife and I have had two dogs.  The first was a miniature poodle, Hogan, who came to live with us about 20 years ago.

We loved that little guy – and “little” means about 15pounds.  He added a lot to our lives.

When he went to heaven, we traveled to the same poodle breeder near where we live – a reputable breeder by all accounts – and got our second poodle, Callaway.  Hogan was probably his uncle or something along that line.

We have had Callaway for more than six years now, and, like Hogan, he is part of our family.

To think about this issue – humans and dogs – I did what I often do, which is to consult Mr. Google.  Here is what I found.

• Most humans love dogs for a variety of reasons.  Dogs are known for their loyalty, companionship, and affectionate nature, which can bring a sense of joy, comfort, and emotional support to their human companions.  Additionally, dogs are often seen as playful, protective, and can provide a sense of security.

• The “love hormone” oxytocin connects us with our pups.  Dogs and people recognize emotions in members of the other species to the degree that is typically only possible within one’s own species.

• Dogs don’t judge us, answer back or lie to us – in fact, they are the source of comfort that many people crave.  It doesn’t matter who you are, what you look like, or what job you do, as long as you are kind to your dog, he or she will love you.

The latter point grabs me in this sense.  When I come home from the golf course, no matter how I played, Hogan in the past and Callaway in the current love me.  I don’t have to shoot a good round to garner their love; it comes naturally.

This week, my wife, Nancy, also a dog lover, sent me this story — Nine Signs of Love From Your Pup.

Here is a reprint:

Do you ever wonder if your dog could possibly love you as much as you love them?  We have many ways to show our love for dogs, including pets, walks, playtime, and caring for them.  While dogs might not be able to talk to you, they have plenty of ways to show you that they love you.  These nine actions are a good sign that your dog loves you back, and it’s not just a one-sided relationship. 

1. Playing and wrestling with you.  Dogs love to play, and wrestling is their natural way of having fun.  It’s the way that they play with other dogs as well. 
2. Leaning against you.  Dogs love physical attention; when they want more from you, they will lean, nuzzle, or cuddle you for extra love.  It means they feel safe. 
3. Sleeping with you.  Dogs are pack animals and sleep huddled together.  If your dog sleeps near you, it shows that they feel safe and that they care.
4. Cuddling with your belongings.  Dedicated dogs love everything about their humans, including their scent.  They might like to carry around your items and sleep near them.
5. Jumping on you.  While many owners discourage their dogs from jumping up, it is a sign of love.  Your pup is excited that you have returned and is celebrating the moment.
6. Bringing gifts to you.  Dogs will often bring humans their favorite toys to show you that they want to play or share with you.
7. Wagging tails.  The tail isn’t always a sign of happiness, but if the dog is wagging their tail loosely and has comfortable body language, it’s safe to say that they are excited.
8. Holding eye contact.  If dogs are willing to maintain eye contact with you, it’s a sign of trust and love.  Brains release oxytocin when there is maintained eye contact between dogs and humans.
9. Following you around.  Dogs know who is responsible for their food and shelter and will often follow their owners because they love being near you. 
   
   

Few bonds are as close and special – no questions asked – as the one with your dog. 

For my wife and me, Callaway is a special part of our family.

So, find a dog to love and be loved back. 

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

Consider these recent developments:

1. Oregon State University:  The Beavers, without several of their key players who either transferred or opted not to play – not to mention their coach who left the university hanging by high-tailing it to Michigan – got plastered 40-8 by Notre Dame in the Sun Bowl.  The fact that so many were missing contributed to the lopsided loss.

• Georgia and Florida State:  The latter also was missing a boatload of players, so lost to Georgia by a score of 63-3.

The New York Times wrote this:

“Georgia coach Kirby Smart doesn’t often get on a soapbox and usually tries to avoid making headlines.  This was uncharacteristic.  But it was clear that, as happy as he was about how his team played, he also felt pity for what Florida State coach Mike Norvell and his remaining players had to endure.

“The Seminoles were down more than two dozen players who finished the season with the team, including six starters who opted out to prepare for the 2024 NFL Draft.”

• The University of Oregon:  The Ducks opted for a different approach by emphasizing the importance of the Fiesta Bowl.  And they won by a wide margin – 45-6 against outmanned Liberty University.

What was important about this game was several-fold:  (a) U of O coach Dan Lanning said it was important to finish strong; (b) two players who didn’t have to play – Bo Nix and Bucky Irving – went out strong, even as both head toward pro football careers; (c) and Nix came across as the solid human being he is by giving God credit for his performance as his parents watched from the stands decked out in their U of O regalia.

Good for Nix and the U of O. 

• And, how about this?  The worst football coaching decision this year, if not longer, belongs to Miami head coach Mario Cristobal.

Here is how the Washington Post described the Cristobal mess under this headline:  “Miami declines to take a knee against Georgia Tech.”

“All the Miami football team had to do to defeat Georgia Tech on October 7 was take a knee.  The Hurricanes had a three-point lead with 35 seconds remaining, and the Yellow Jackets were out of timeouts.  One kneel-down would end the game.  Instead, Miami called for a handoff to running back Donald Chaney Jr.  The result:  Calamity.

“Georgia Tech recovered Chaney’s fumble and embarked on a 74-yard drive that took all of 24 seconds.  It ended with quarterback Haynes King completing a 44-yard touchdown pass to a wide-open Christian Leary with one second remaining, giving Georgia Tech a 23-20 victory.

“’Not going to make an excuse for it, say we should’ve done this or that,’ Coach Mario Cristobal said of his decision. ‘That’s it.  We should’ve done it.  Sometimes you get carried away with, just, finish the game and run it.  I should’ve stepped in and said, ‘Hey, just take a knee.’”

I don’t have much respect for Cristobal, given the way he exited the University of Oregon head coaching position several years ago, leaving after exclaiming loudly hat he would not do so.  Defenders might say he was leaving to go home to Florida, but the dishonest way he departed reminds me of what Jonathan Smith just did to Oregon State University.

Perhaps given Cristobal’s football acumen – now in question – better that he left the U of O.

So, on to 2024, when the college athletic scene, especially in football, will undergo even more changes.  The betting is that I won’t like most of them, as if my view matters.

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

This, remember, is one of five departments I run with a free hand to manage as I see fit, as would any management guru like me.

The others are the Department of Pet Peeves, the Department of Inquiring Minds Want to Know, the Department of Words Matter, and the Department of “Just Saying.”

So, here are more good quotes.

FROM WALL STREET JOURNAL EDITORIAL WRITERS:  Under this headline – “Maine Casts Its Ballot for Trump,” the writers said this:

“The Democrat secretary of state in Maine played into the former president’s hands by blocking his candidacy.

“This week’s huge in-kind contribution to Donald Trump’s re-election campaign is from Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, who announced Thursday that she will unilaterally delete Trump’s name from the presidential primary ballot.  Maine is now the second state, after Colorado, to declare him a January 6 insurrectionist under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.  Paging the U.S. Supreme Court, alas.”

COMMENT:  It’s incredibly perverse that anything which goes against Trump becomes only another plank in his platform.  Which assumes that he has a platform other than his own, personal aggrandizement.  He doesn’t.

FROM MATTHEW HENNESEY, DEPUTY FEATURES EDITOR OF THE WALL STREET JOURNAL:  “Unambiguously, slavery was a cause of the Civil War. It might even have been the primary cause.  But it wasn’t the only cause.

“History is complex and major events never have a single or simple explanation.  A short list of hinge points that fit the description:  The fall of Rome, the French Revolution, World War I, the Great Depression, the rise of Trump.

“The American Civil War belongs on that list.  You can obviously make a case for it, and many have done so.  But a Southern politician on the stump in New England (Nikki Haley) should know better than to try.  And if she’s going to try, she has to be sure she’s going to get it right.

“Sometimes it feels as if we’re living in a dream.  Does anyone else think it strange that, in the waning days of 2023, we’re debating the cause of the Civil War?  It seems even stranger that one candidate for the GOP nomination can casually suggest the public execution of public officials and seemingly pay no political price while another has to spend several news cycles explaining what amounts to a poor choice of words.”

COMMENT:  Haley, who must know that she “always on” as a presidential candidate, made a mistake and she is paying a price for it, no matter how hard she tries to make up for the error.

As for the public execution comment, obviously it’s Trump.  And, as usual, he pays no price for such an over-the-top, if not allegedly criminal, statement.  With the Journal editor, I say, “It seems even stranger that one candidate for the GOP nomination can casually suggest the public execution of public officials and seemingly pay no political price while another has to spend several news cycles explaining what amounts to a poor choice of words.”

MORE FROM WALL STREET JOURNAL EDITORIAL WRITERS:  “New York Governor Kathy Hochul vetoed a bill that would have broadly banned employment non-compete agreements.  New York has a highly competitive economic climate and is home to many different industries,” she said in her veto message.  “These companies have legitimate interests that cannot be met with the legislation’s one-size-fits-all approach.

“Businesses use non-compete agreements to restrict employees from going to work for competitors for a specified period after they leave a company.  The purpose is to protect a company’s intellectual property and investment in worker development.  The agreements are most common in high-paying fields such as finance, tech, and bio-tech.”

COMMENT:  Hochul’s wise action reminded me of my involvement in non-compete issues when I was a lobbyist in Oregon.  As I represented the Oregon Association of Broadcasters, an antagonist, a former TV reporter who made it into the Oregon Legislature, proposed to ban non-competes in broadcasting.

Those clauses were used by many radio and television stations to protect their huge investments in high-profile anchor positions.  So, add the broadcast industry to the list above – finance, tech, bio-tech, and broadcast.

To the legislator involved in the issues in Oregon that I handled as a lobbyist, the truth didn’t matter.  He went to work to impose the ban and, with help from my broadcast clients, we managed to save at least part of the non-compete contract issue, so it can to be used by the industry in Oregon.

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

In the past couple weeks, I have written two blogs on a subject I would describe as “reflecting on the past and looking toward the future.”

I did so because one of my friends, in a recent meeting, contended that things were far worse today than ever before.

Several columnists I read considered that premise and said, “no,” things were bad in the past, too, marked by such issues as “the Great Depression,” the holocaust amid World War II, the Vietnam War, and the political divisions in this country, if not the world.

The point was to say what Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin wrote in a piece today that appeared under this headline:  “Get real and read some history. The past was worse.”

Her introduction:

“Nostalgia is a powerful political tool.  Wielding nostalgia for a bygone era — one that is invariably mischaracterized — is a favorite weapon for fascist movements (Make America Great Again), harking back to a time before their nation was ‘polluted’ by malign forces.

“In the United States, such nostalgia none-too-subtlety appeals to white Christian nationalism.  Even in a more benign form (e.g., “Politics didn’t used to be so mean,” “Remember the days of bipartisanship?”) plays on faulty memories.  If you really go back to study U.S. history, you would find two things:  The past was worse, and conflict has always been the norm.”

Rather than write more about Rubin, I choose here to reprint here her column.

**********

The past was simply not “better” by any objective standard.  Economically, we were all a lot poorer.  “In 1960, there were roughly 400 vehicles per 1,000 Americans, about half of today’s car ownership rate. In other words, a family in 1960 could afford a car on one income, but today they would have two cars,” Matthew Yglesias wrote.  

Tom Nichols has written extensively on the politics of false memory. (“Times are always bad. Nothing gets better. And the past 50 years have not been a temporary economic purgatory but a permanent hell, if only the elites would be brave enough to peer through the gloom and see it all for what it is,” he wrote. “This obsession with decline is one of the myths surrounding postindustrial democracy that will not die.”)

Crime was higher by a lot in the 1970s.  Poverty, child mortality, deaths from virtually any major disease, workplace injuries, high school dropout rates, etc., were all much worse in the 1950s.  Also, kids got polio, Jim Crow was in full swing, gays had to be in the closet and no one had cellphones, home computers or microwave ovens.  Very few people had air conditioning or could afford to fly.

You might rightly decry income inequality today.  However, since 2007, income inequality has been on the decline.  The 1930s?  The Great Depression.  You prefer the 1940s?  World war.  Then came McCarthyism and the Cold War.

The 1960s? Riots, assassinations, the Vietnam War.  You get the point.  Though those who rail against modernity, urbanity, pluralism, tolerance, and personal freedom in service of an authoritarian perch would like to turn back the clock, a perusal of history suggests now is the best time to be alive.

And that brings us to the myth of bi-partisanship, unity, and frictionless politics. From the get-go, politics in America was vicious.  The Post’s review of H.W. Brands’s latest book, “Founding Partisans: Hamilton, Madison, Jefferson, Adams and the Brawling Birth of American Politics,” reminded us that “they all hastened to assume the worst of one another:  Jefferson, watching the government amass power and assume state debt, concluded that Hamilton’s Federalists were royalists and corrupt financiers who had been plotting ‘to betray the people’ since independence.”

In turn, “Federalists, conversely, thought Republicans ideologically deranged to the point of near-treason.  Blind infatuation with a hostile (and anarchic) France, faith in state sovereignty, Luddite opinions on public debt — all of these seemed like symptoms of a deeper mania among Jefferson’s followers.” Consider whether this sounds familiar.

And, so the knives came out quick and often.  The parties established mouthpieces in the media to lambaste one another.  Gossip about the personal lives of leaders was a favorite topic, with Hamilton and Jefferson providing good grist for the rumor mill.  Come Independence Day, 1788, celebratory toasts by one party included wishes of “never-dying remorse, pain, poverty and contempt” for their opponents.

Fast forward to the mid-19th century: The country is torn asunder by slavery, a bloody civil war follows, military occupation (Reconstruction) of the South provides a brief interlude and then strict racial segregation returns.

You can flip through the history of presidential insults, devastating feuds and congressional violence. None of this suggests we ever enjoyed a sustained halcyon period of unity. To be certain, we had brief interludes when World War II united the country and when the ideological gaps between the parties were not as vast.

However, we “got things done” mostly when one party (in modern times, usually Republicans) got wiped out in elections, leaving Democrats to construct the New Deal and the Great Society. Republicans vilified Democrats every step of the way (even testing out a coup against Franklin D. Roosevelt).

What we have not had before is a president who rejected democracy, attempted to retain power by force and wound up indicted on 91 criminal counts. So yes, four-times-indicted Donald Trump was worse than every president who preceded him.  The resulting venom, violence, and loss of faith in elections have taken a heavy toll on our democracy.

Where does that leave us? The past (especially the immediate past president!) was infinitely worse in myriad ways. (This is not to say that we don’t have our problems, from climate change to homelessness to suicide; we do, however, have more resources and knowledge to address these.)

Conflict and even violence have been a constant presence in American life. But so, too, has been progress, albeit halting at times, toward greater freedom and prosperity. We generally are living healthier, longer lives. If nothing else, the 21st century is evidence that we are a resilient people.

So, as we look forward to 2024 be wary:  Nostalgia, especially nostalgia for a time of less freedom, less opportunity, and fewer rights for many of us, is the stuff of snake-oil salesmen.  Instead, bet on American progress.

*********

AND THIS CONCLUSION FROM ME:  Rubin is right on at least this count:  She calls out a presidential candidate – yes, Donald Trump – who campaigns against democracy and, incredibly, is under 91 criminal indictments.

And, another right:  She encourages all of us to find a way to look on the bright side and “bet on American progress.”

Finally, I make this point on the last day of 2023.  Tonight, we head into another year, 2024.  Let’s work to do our part to make it a good year, even if we don’t like some of what we see and hear.

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

This is the second in a two-part blog series which asks two questions – (a) are things worse today than ever before (that was the first one), and (b) is it possible to look on the bright side (this is the second one)

**********

A Washington Post story made this point the other day:  “These gifts have nothing to do with holidays.  They’re about humanity.”

The writer, Petula Dvorak, started her story this way:

Error! Filename not specified.

“Miss Petula, there’s someone in the lobby here for you,” our security guard, Robin, said when she called up to my desk in our old 15th Street building.

“She has a lot, and I’m talkin’ a LOT of, um, diapers,” Robin said, a little uneasily.  “Can you come deal with this?”

“This is a story about the Christmas spirit — that bursting, full-hearted, pine-spiced, jingle-bell mood — that we’re all soaking in right now.

“Except that these diapers, this beautiful, thoughtful gift, came in April.”

Dvorak went on to cite other instances of neighbor-helping-neighbor which serves as a good contrast to what we see in the media every day – wars, rumors of wars, killing innocent civilians, homeless persons walking the streets, often amid bitter cold, and, then worse, Donald Trump issuing more tripe about immigrants polluting America.

On the latter, I cannot help but state this fact:  All of us, including Trump, are immigrants who have forebears who made a way to have a life in a free country, or are first-generation immigrants ourselves. 

Now, Trump would propose to make into the United States into an autocracy that would not tolerate anyone who was not White.

Okay, enough about Trump.  More about the bright side.

Dvorak continued her story:

“I had just written a column about Juan Jordan, one of the few single fathers living in what was once the shame of D.C.’s shelter system — an abandoned hospital that housed nearly 600 homeless children and their families — with his one-year-old daughter after he was laid off.

“Not only did readers send checks and gift cards for him, but several also showed up in our lobby with boxes of baby clothes, a playpen and this — a giant duffel bag of disposable diapers.  Because every parent knows how crucial and pricey these little things are.”

Why did this occur, Dvorak asks.

Then, she answers her own question:

“Because beyond politics and race, socio-economics, nationality, sexuality, and religion — the topics that occupy so much of our media diet — our humanity connects us through our struggles, our dreams, and our triumphs year-round.

“That human connection brings out the best in people.”

Plus, this additional story from Dvorak:  

“I’m so proud to contribute to this young man’s future.  I can’t think of a better investment to make than in America’s youth,” wrote Robert Scott Bass, in a message accompanying a $1,000 donation to the GoFundMe a reader set help send Kamari Felton to college.

“I wrote about Felton this summer, after he’d been accepted to Frostburg State University and was about to move out of a homeless shelter and into a dorm.  Then, all of his funding was yanked out from under him.

“The university and government officials finally got their acts together and restored his funding after we banged on in this column about the mess.  But in the meantime, in the swampy malaise of a D.C. summer — with no holiday cheer or spirit of Christmas to move them — readers raised $42,900 that won’t just get him to college; it also will help keep him there.”

So, to those who might say “things are worse today than ever before,” it’s not true. 

On one hand, there have been terrible times in other parts of our history, but, if you take time to look on the bright side, you’ll find stories of acts of human kindness and consideration that will give you a positive lease on life.

Further, at this Christmas season, it is good to reflect on the “reason for the season” – that Christ came to earth about 2,000 years ago to give us a way to have a relationship with Him and to value other persons as “real persons” worthy of love and connection.

Which makes bad things on this earth seem far less momentous.

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

This is the first in a two-part blog series that focuses on two questions –

(a) how bad are things today, and

(b) is there a way to look on the bright side

I participated in a group discussion recently where the leader uttered this phrase:  “Things are worse today than ever before.”

The leader, a friend, made this point by referring to all kinds of violence and unrest roiling our country and the world.

But, was he right?

I don’t think so, for at least two reasons:

• First, if we look back on history, there have been tough times in our country and the world, perhaps worse than what is happening today.  For the U.S., think only of “the depression,” which my age group did not live through.  Or, the Vietnam War years.  I did life through that.  Or, the Holocaust in World War II.

• Second, the influence of the media – especially social media – is so pervasive today that we know much more than our forebears did in their lifetimes.

Here is more information on both reasons, which I provide only for context, not necessarily to make any larger point.

WHAT DOES HISTORY TELL US?:  Here, I had to look no further than a column by Karl Rove that appeared in the Wall Street Journal.

His name is not one I would logically associate with a look-back at history because he has made a name for himself, not in that field, but in political consulting, sometimes in controversial ways.

Still, his column resonated.  So here are excerpts.

“America is deeply divided. Our politics is broken, marked by anger, contempt, and distrust.  We must acknowledge that reality but not lose historical perspective.  It’s bad now, but it’s been worse before — and not only during the Civil War.

“Let’s look backward and start with the mid-1960s to early ’70s.  The nation was bitterly divided over civil rights, the “sexual revolution” and an increasingly unpopular war in Southeast Asia.

“The just and peaceful civil-rights protests of the 1950s and early ’60s were often met with state-sanctioned violence.  Then Harlem exploded in 1964, followed by a riot in Philadelphia.  Watts went up in flames in 1965; Chicago, Cleveland, and San Francisco the next year.”

Rove went on to name other tough times in our history, such as the depression I mentioned earlier, plus the Civil War (if any war can be called “civil”).

THE RISE OF SOCIAL MEDIA:  Look only so far as Facebook to understand the influence of social media.

For the record, I quit using Facebook about a year ago, but it was then the largest social media platform in the world, with 2.4 billion users in 2019.

Minus one:  Me.

From Google:

• Other social media platforms, including YouTube and WhatsApp, also had over one billion users each.
• These numbers are huge – in 2019, there were 7.7 billion people worldwide, with at least 3.5 billion on-line.  This means social media platforms were used by one in three people worldwide and more than two-thirds of all Internet users.
• Social media has changed the world.  The rapid and vast adoption of these technologies is changing how we find partners, access information from the news, and organize to demand political change.

And, statistics such as these indicate that, whether we like it or not, we have the ability to know more today than ever before.  Of course, some of what we know is fake or contrived, but, still, we live in an information age.

So, back to the basic question.  Are things worse today than ever before? 

I say the answer is “no,” even though all of us, as Americans, need to be vigilant so we contribute positively to society, not negatively.

And, without being a Poly-Anna, we need to take time to look on the bright side in our world (which I summarize in my next blog).  If we do, we often would like what we see – neighbor helping neighbor, charitable organizations doing good work in communities, solid citizens working on such issues as homelessness, and other examples.

So, recognize that there are problems in the world, but also positive developments.  Be part of that positivity.