Perspective from the 19^th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

I know this blog headline is true because, when I served on the Oregon Government Ethics Commission (OGEC), we tried to deal with the issue, too.

Because I have retired from the Commission, I am free to write about this issue.  And, I add that, in what for me is an ethical commitment, I won’t include anything in this blog that should remain confidential, honoring all my past commitments on this subject, as well as current ones.

The public meeting issue boils down to this:

Is it possible to preserve Oregon’s decades-long commitment to government actions being done in public – the “public meetings” law – while, at the same time, allowing public officials to talk with each other between meetings?

Sounds simple, but it is not.

Excerpts from a story in the Oregonian newspaper this week illustrate the tension.  The story appeared under this headline:  Bill could enable secret government talks, Oregon ethics chief warns.

On top of that, Oregonian editor Laura Gunderson upped the ante by writing a public letter to subscribers, contending that a “fix bill” under consideration in the Legislature is not worth passing because, she contended, confusion over the law is no reason to inject more secrecy.

And the East Oregonian newspaper in Pendleton, Oregon entered the fray with this comment:

“Oregonians are increasingly losing faith in their government and institutions.  All too often, it feels like actions are taken without any notice or public input.   A bill racing ahead in the current legislative session would only heighten that unease.  It has the potential to create huge loopholes in Oregon’s longstanding open meetings law, enacted more than 50 years ago in recognition of the public’s right to know what government is up to.”

Here is how the original Oregonian story started:

“Oregon’s 53-year-old public meetings law requires elected officials to deliberate in public.  After the Newberg School Board was accused of violating public meetings law, the Oregon Government Ethics Commission was granted the power to enforce public meeting requirements.

But the grant in 2023 was based on a piece of legislation then that has become controversial now.

So, the “fix bill” is under consideration in the current short special session in Salem, Oregon.

“A bill intended to clarify what public officials can and cannot talk about outside of public meetings could lead to secret discussions of public business by some or all members of city councils or other local governments,” the head of Oregon’s Ethics Commission told lawmakers Tuesday.

The Oregonian added:  “It is the intent of the public meetings law that government decisions be arrived at openly.  Yet, House Bill 4177, strongly supported by virtually every local government association in Oregon, would allow “many more private conversations and discussions … that might relate to a decision that is about to be made.”

Myers added that a section that would provide broad exceptions to the public meetings law ‘gives me heartburn.’

Well, it is not an exaggeration to say that local government organizations – especially cities led by the League of Oregon Cities – have heartburn over Myers’ efforts to implement the 2023 legislation.

So much so that the League told me when I chaired the Ethics Commission last year that it would no longer attend Commission training sessions on the public meetings law, even as the association leveled heavy criticism overall.

Plus, in my last year on the Commission, we spent a lot of time handling complaints about alleged local government violations of the open meetings law, so much so that we had to increase the frequency of Commission meetings to handle the growing workload.

With the tension, it was clear to some that action needed to be taken to improve the law.

Under the existing law, local government organizations are not allowed to meet in the same ways legislators do, or, if they do, they would be subject to complaints.

Representative Nathan Sosa formed a “work group” to try to reach agreement on a compromise.  [Sosa is a talented representative and, in the spirit of full disclosure, I worked closely with him when he served on and chaired the Ethics Commission before getting elected to the Legislature from his home in the Hillsboro.]

The Sosa work group included local government associations that want clearer guidance for their members.  They tried to craft language to help elected officials, many of them unpaid volunteers, know where to draw the line when texting or talking to each other outside of public meetings.

But the Oregonian reported that four high-profile Oregon journalism leaders, including an in-house lawyer for Oregon Public Broadcasting and Therese Bottomly, retired former editor of The Oregonian/OregonLive, testified they had “grave concerns” that the proposed compromise bill would allow elected officials to engage in wide-ranging private discussions about public business.

“’Public meetings are often the only way that journalists and other members of the public can find out what their government is doing and what the issues are,” said Nick Budnick, sunshine chair of the Greater Oregon Chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists, which was invited to have a representative on the work group.

“’This bill is rife with potential to circumvent the people’s law in ways that run contrary to the Legislature’s intent.  It would significantly narrow the definition of the kind of deliberation that needs to be conducted in the view of the public in the light of day to keep the public informed,’ he added.”

There’s the challenge:  Require government decisions to be made in public but allow officials to talk privately.

It is not clear yet whether the compromise bill will pass in this short session, but passage did appear more likely late last week as several legislators voted for it in committee even as they said they were not sure it was a good solution.

Then that possibility gained a bit of momentum late this week when a subcommittee of the Joint Ways and Means Committee voted the bill out to the full committee.  And, if you wonder why this bill was in the budget-making committee, it was to keep it alive late in the short session since bills there always are alive until adjournment.

Several legislators have said that, if the compromise doesn’t work, they will re-visit the issue in the next long session in 2027.

My quick view:  Legislators are facing the same complex issue we faced when I served on the Ethics Commission.  The best solution remains unclear.

Perspective from the 19^th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

Some observers – those who support real, genuine Christianity, including me – might say “it’s about time.”

The headline on this blog appeared in USA Today and was picked up by other newspapers, such as the Salem Statesman-Journal where we live in Salem, Oregon.

Here is how the reporter, Marc Ramirez, started his national story.

“Hundreds of Christian leaders and scholars nationwide are denouncing President Donald Trump’s administration and urging more active resistance among the faithful to ‘the injustices and anti-democratic danger sweeping across the nation.’”

Well written and well said.

Rather than write about this first, I’ll just publish the USA Today article in full because it is so good, then make a few comments.

**********

Hundreds of Christian leaders and scholars nationwide are denouncing President Donald Trump’s administration and urging more active resistance among the faithful to “the injustices and anti-democratic danger sweeping across the nation.”

“We are facing a cruel and oppressive government,” their collective statement begins.  “In moments like this, silence is not neutrality ‒ it is an active choice to permit harm.”

Titled “A Call to Christians in a Crisis of Faith and Democracy,” the letter says the nation is facing a profound moral, spiritual, and democratic emergency.  Its release coincides with the start of the Christian season of Lent, a period of repentance, self-reflection, and resistance to temptation.

“We thought it was important to tie into a season where many Christians go deeper into their faith,” said Adam Russell Taylor, president of Sojourners, a Christian social justice organization.  “Part of what we’re critiquing is the way in which many White evangelical Christians succumb to an unconditional support of the administration, despite the fact that its actions are completely antithetical to the teachings of Jesus.”

Leaders of all faiths have increasingly spoken out and participated in protests against the policies of the Trump administration, particularly aimed at what many see as overly aggressive efforts to detain and deport undocumented immigrants.  Pastors have been arrested and struck with pepper balls during demonstrations.

The statement says Christians have a moral obligation to speak out against “citizens and immigrants being demonized, disappeared, and even killed; the erosion of hard-won rights and freedoms; and a calculated effort to reverse America’s growing racial and ethnic diversity – all of which are pushing us toward authoritarian and imperial rule.”

“This moment is a defining test of Christian discipleship and civic responsibility,” said the Rev. Jim Wallis, founder and director of the Georgetown Center for Faith and Justice in Washington, DC.  “Democratic freedoms are being taken away and the gospel is being distorted.  The vulnerable people Jesus told us to stand with and defend are being targeted and assaulted.”

Wallis and Taylor organized the collective effort along with Barbara Williams-Skinner, president of Baltimore’s Skinner Institute, a faith leadership development organization.

About 400 people initially signed the statement, representing a range of Christian denominations, leaders of Black, Asian and Latino churches and associations and Christian universities and institutions.  Hundreds more have added their names since the letter’s February 18 release, organizers say.

The Executive Office of the President of the United States, which includes the White House office, did not respond to a request for comment about the statement.

The Christian leaders and scholars say, aside from the risks to democracy, they are troubled by “a Christian faith corrupted by the heretical ideology of White Christian nationalism.”

“People look at it as just a democratic crisis, but it’s not,” said the Rev. Cynthia Hale, pastor of Ray of Hope Christian Church in Decatur, Georgia, who was among those who signed the letter.  “It’s a crisis of faith.”

Christian nationalism, the idea that Christian people and biblical law should govern American life, has seeped into the highest levels of American government, with conservative evangelicals becoming a major political force with strong support of Trump.  Evangelical pastor Doug Wilson, who has said women should neither vote nor hold religious or political leadership positions, was recently invited by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth to conduct a service at the Pentagon.

“Their religious leaders have been so unconditionally supportive that it’s almost branded this administration as being religious in the minds of many Americans, which is a distortion,” said Bishop Raymond Rivera of the Council of Holistic Christian Churches and Ministries, who also signed the letter.  “They’ve confused proximity to political power with proximity to the power of God.  They’re not the same.”

Taylor called such conflation “a form of idolatry” and said the Trump administration in turn has misused Christian language to support its activities, such as Immigration and Customs Enforcement recruitment ads that quote scripture in their appeals – one ad, for instance, includes a verse saying “Blessed are the peacemakers.”

“That feels particularly offensive and egregious in light of the tactics we’ve seen them employ in Minneapolis, Chicago, Los Angeles and elsewhere,” he said.  “It’s corrupting the Christian faith to advance its own political agenda.”

Kristin Kobes Du Mez, a professor of history and gender studies at Calvin University, a Christian institution in Grand Rapids, Michigan, said she initially wondered before signing whether the moment required something more than signing yet another statement.

“I realized this statement isn’t primarily for people who have been on the front lines of these issues but for pastors and ordinary Christians who may be just waking up to what’s happening and what’s at stake,” Du Mez said. “I think it’s important to offer a statement that clarifies the political and theological stakes and that people can put their name behind.  This is a way for ordinary Christians to step up.”

The letter concludes by tying a set of core theological convictions to actions the signers pledge to take to practice their faith and protect democracy, including defending voting rights, pursuing peace, and standing with unjustly targeted immigrants.

Dottie Escobedo-Frank, bishop of the United Methodist Church’s California-Pacific Conference in Pasadena, said she signed the letter to encourage her Southern California community and all Christians to live out their callings to serve the downtrodden, demonstrate compassion, and challenge political leaders to act on their behalf.

However, with church ministries offering food distribution, childcare, or elderly assistance having faced disruption from ICE agents or anti-immigrant demonstrators, “we’re seeing people in our communities who are afraid to live out their faith because of the actions of our government,” she said.

Taylor understands many may be justifiably fearful of living out their creed, but said it’s critical for people to engage at a time when “the pages of the authoritarian playbook are very much in effect,” he said.

He said one way to overcome such fears, aside from leaning into the resilience of faith itself, is to connect with other Christians.  The letter effort includes a website where supporters can find ways to get involved.

“One of the most consistent refrains in scripture is ‘do not be afraid,’” Taylor said. “Authoritarian governments thrive on people feeling isolated and overwhelmed, so we’re trying to create a network of solidarity and courage. We have the power to prevent things from getting worse.”

*********

My comments:

I appreciate the letter because it illustrates that it is past time for Christian leaders to call out Trump and his sycophants for promoting their fake brand of Christianity.  So, the letter does the good deed.

God is too big for Trump and it is too bad that it appears he doesn’t know Him.

Back in the day, when I was on the leadership team at Salem Alliance Church in Salem, Oregon, I was part of an effort to make sure our church did not risk becoming just another political instrument, as had happened to many churches around the country.

We viewed a bright line – from the platform or in writing, don’t tell those in the congregation how to vote; let them make their own decisions – but also don’t be afraid to provide a Biblical perspective on what could be labeled “political issues,” emphasis on the word “issues.”

We wanted to focus instead on what Christ has done for us, even as we live as citizens in a country, paying credit as the Scripture advises, “to render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s,” from Matthew 22:21.

But, given the huge excesses of Trump, it is time to say, “enough is enough.”

I join with letter signers to call out “the injustices and anti-democratic danger sweeping across the nation” due to Trump’s bid to become an autocrat, someone equal to a god.

Enough is enough.  God’s name should not be taken in vain any longer by Trump or anyone else.  If you choose to play politics, just don’t do it in the name of the real God.

Perspective from the 19^th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

Those who know me know that I am bit of a political junkie, though I also find other stuff to do with my time.

I don’t watch much political news on television, preferring the well-written articles in the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, and the New York Times.

And I did not watch last night’s “State of the Union” speech by Donald Trump.  I preferred not to listen to his nearly two hours of lies and invective.

So it was that I focused instead on good quotes from Yogi Berra, the great New York Yankee catcher who died in 2015.

Besides being a solid baseball player, he was known for good quotes, sometimes malapropisms – and, if you don’t know what that word means, here is a definition:

“The mistaken use of a word in place of a similar-sounding one, often with unintentionally amusing effect, as in, for example, “dance a flamingo,” instead of flamenco.”

It is possible that no one in history was better at malapropisms or mis-speaking than Berra.  So, here are some of his best ones.

• “It’s like deja vu all over again”
• “We made too many wrong mistakes”
• “You can observe a lot just by watching”
• “A nickel ain’t worth a dime anymore”
• “He hits from both sides of the plate.  He’s amphibious”
• “If the world was perfect, it wouldn’t be”
• “If you don’t know where you’re going, you might end up some place else”
• Responding to a question about remarks attributed to him that he did not think were his: “I really didn’t say everything I said”
• “The future ain’t what it used to be”
• “I think Little League is wonderful.  It keeps the kids out of the house”
• On why he no longer went to Ruggeri’s, a St. Louis restaurant: “Nobody goes there anymore because it’s too crowded”
• “I always thought that record would stand until it was broken”
• When giving directions to Joe Garagiola to his New Jersey home, which is accessible by two routes: “When you come to a fork in the road, take it”
• “Always go to other people’s funerals, otherwise they won’t come to yours”
• “Never answer anonymous letters”
• “The towels were so thick there I could hardly close my suitcase”
• “Half the lies they tell about me aren’t true”
• As a general comment on baseball: “90 per cent of the game is half mental.”
• “I don’t know if they were men or women running naked across the field. They had bags over their heads”
• “Yogi, you are from St. Louis, we live in New Jersey, and you played ball in New York.  If you go before I do, where would you like me to have you buried?” — Carmen Berra, Yogi’s wife. “Surprise me”
• “It ain’t over till it’s over”

Yes, and now this blog is over.

Perspective from the 19^th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

………This is part 2 of a series of immigrants/refugees………

A great program that serves refugees in Salem, Oregon where I live much of the year could be under attack soon.

And when I say it is a program that serves refugees you won’t be surprised to hear about the source of the threat.

Yes, Donald Trump and his sycophants.

In part 1 yesterday, I noted that Trump himself is a son of an immigrant, his mother.  His father’s heritage goes back to German a generation ago.  So, the point is that Trump, himself, has immigrant heritage, which makes it even more ironic that he comes across as hating all immigrants.

Which means, in a way, he hates himself.  And, I guess, in the case of Trump, that almost makes sense!

For the following report on threats to the Salem, Oregon, refugee community, it is important to add that I am indebted to Salem Reporter, an excellent on-line source of journalism in my hometown.  It is edited by a long-time journalist in Oregon, Les Zaitz, whom I knew well when I worked in and around government and he was an investigative reporter for the Oregonian newspaper.

He now plies journalism ground in several ways, one of which is by editing and publishing Salem Reporter.  Nuggets of information below come from a story by reporter Abbey McDonald.

Here is how she started her report:

“Luke Glaze worried when he saw federal actions in Minnesota involving refugees.

“The federal government in January launched an immigration enforcement operation to re-evaluate the status of around 5,600 refugees living in Minnesota.  Federal officials ultimately detained dozens of people, flying them to detention facilities in Texas, where they were questioned for days.  Those released had no ticket back home.”

So, Glaze, executive director of Salem for Refugees, wondered if Oregon and Salem could be the next Trump target.

More from Glaze:

“Those actions a half a country away prompted concerns for future enforcement actions against 15,000 people in Oregon who fall into the targeted group of those who arrived during the Biden Administration, and haven’t yet obtained a green card through a legal process that Trump suspended.”

McDonald also reported that it was the latest in a series of federal policy changes, enforcement operations, and resource restrictions which has shaken Salem’s refugee community in recent months.  As a result, Glaze pivoted his non-profit operations from re-settlement efforts to support, education and protection for those who are here.

When a federal judge put a stop to the Minnesota detainment operation with a temporary restraining order, McDonald reported that Glaze hoped it would bring reprieve for the 2,000 people his organization serves.  They all came to the U.S. through a legal process open to those fleeing danger and persecution in their home countries.

“We thought that was kind of good news, and a sign that maybe U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement would have to change their tactics, maybe just move to a standard interview to re-vet refugees rather than having detention as part of that process.
Then, on Wednesday, February 18, McDonald continued, a memo came from the Department of Homeland Security stating that all refugees applying for green cards must return to federal custody a year after arrival into the U.S.  The memo said they would be detained indefinitely while being re-vetted, due to concerns for national security and the economy.

“It seems to be that they’re doubling down on this kind of tactic, which is really concerning, because obviously it creates a lot of additional trauma on families that have already experienced a lot of trauma,” Glaze said. 

Families in Salem served by Glaze’ organization come from Ukraine, Iran, Syria, Sudan, Democratic Republic of Congo, Eritrea, Venezuela, and El Salvador.

On Thursday, Salem for Refugees joined the five other resettlement agencies in the state in urging Oregon’s Congressional delegation, Governor Tina Kotek and state legislators to condemn the DHS memo.

“Refugees are lawful community members, workers, parents, and students. Policies that create fear, strip basic supports, and expose families to detention, undermine Oregon’s values and destabilize entire communities,” the joint statement said.

The refugee agencies also repeated their ask for $3.5 million from the Oregon Legislature to mitigate the impact of damaging federal policy shifts.

“How do we continue to help the existing refugee community strengthen and grow so that it is as strong and healthy as possible for when the pendulum swings and we can resettle again?” Glaze asks.

And, in conclusion, Glaze said he’s seen some beauty amid the hardship.

“We see what makes refugees who they are, which is this incredible resilience. Who, despite all these challenges and roadblocks, continue to make a go at life here in the U.S.,” he said.  “Some of them have started businesses in the last few months.  Some of them have graduated high school and are pursuing college, and their careers and goals.”

Glaze’ organization started at the church my wife and I attend in Salem, Oregon, Salem Alliance. The program was that called simply Salem for Refugees, but it has since branched out into a larger organization, which now faces renewed threats every day.

On the part of my wife and myself, we intend to continue supporting Salem for Refugees with money and volunteer action.  It’s the least we can do for these individuals who are on trying to become citizens.

We wish them well on that threat-infused journey.

Perspective from the 19^th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

………This is part 1 of two-part focus on immigrant/refugee issues; the second part will focus on threats to the refugee in community in Salem, Oregon………

The rabbi starts an essay in the New York Times with this profound summary:  “The Bible Tells Us to Love Immigrants”

Then he goes on to make a case for this requirement by citing various Bible passages.

The “he” is Rabbi Shai Held, president and dean of the Hadar Institute, and the author, most recently, of “Judaism Is About Love.”

Here is how he started his essay:

“A hallmark of the second Trump administration has been the hunt for the foreign born, from children to adults, criminal status apparently notwithstanding.  Many of the administration officials who champion this project often invoke God in their speeches, asserting that their allegiance to the Constitution is rooted in their fealty to a far older text:  The Bible.

“It is clear that many of our leaders lack the most fundamental understanding of the central biblical commandment to love and care for the immigrant.”

Held continues to say that “the Bible explicitly commands three loves.  The first and second many modern Christians and Jews cite easily — love of God and love of one’s neighbor.

“The third, and most often overlooked, is love of the ‘ger.’  Several English translations interpret ger as ‘sojourner,’ someone born elsewhere who has come to dwell among the people, most likely temporarily.  Other translations render ger as ‘stranger, ‘alien’ or ‘foreigner.’”

In recent decades, Held says some biblical scholars have returned to an older idea:  That ger should be translated as something close to “immigrant.”

He goes on to outline background on other Biblical references:

• Writing about the book of Exodus, the 11th-century Jewish biblical commentator Rashi explains that “wherever ger occurs in Scriptures it signifies a person who has not been born in that land where he is living but has come from another country to sojourn there.”  The word “immigrant” matters, in this context — it reminds us that in the ancient world, just as now, someone seeking a home among people foreign to him had likely endured significant upheaval in his life, like war, famine, political oppression or economic crisis.
• The commandment to love immigrants is one of the Bible’s greatest moral revolutions.  Other ancient Near Eastern cultures instructed people to care for widows and orphans.  The Bible expands the category of those who deserve special protection to include those who live among our community but are not quite of it.
• The book of Exodus explicitly forbids the people from mistreating an immigrant.  Contrary to popular assumptions, the prohibition on abusing the vulnerable does not derive only from the children of Israel’s past experience of slavery and oppression.  It is a basic demand of morality:  We must not take advantage of the weak. \
• The book of Leviticus repeats the injunction not to oppress — then adds a mandate to actively love the immigrant. These commands resurface in the book of Deuteronomy, which implies that loving immigrants is a way of emulating God’s love.

Now, in this context, it is impossible for me to omit concerns about Trump and his ilk who go about mistreating immigrants every day.  All immigrants.  Not just those who have committed crimes in this country.

First, the number of immigrants who have committed crimes – or even gotten a traffic – is small.  In the range of, at most, 15 per cent.

Second, Trump himself is the son of an immigrants, his mother.  And his father had German ancestry two generations ago.

So, the question remains:  How can Trump have so much animosity against his own.

For Held’s part, he closes his essay this way:

“Those of us who treat the Bible as authoritative in our lives are aware — through the very text we cite most often — that unchecked, unbridled power is always abhorrent, let alone when it is deployed to attack precisely those who are most vulnerable.”

That paragraph describes Trump exactly.  As Christians, we ought to do two things:  Abhor what he does against immigrants and, more importantly, practice “love for our neighbors” in our own lives, even if those “neighbors” don’t look like us.

The Bible tells us to do so.

Which reminds me of what the pastor of the church we intend always says after he reads Bible verses:  “I have just read from the greatest book ever written and I attest that all of it is true.”

So, I say, follow it.

I add that my wife is doing in her support for a great program where we live in Salem, Oregon – “Salem for Refugees.”  For one thing, there are more refugees that you might think there are in our town.  But, for another, she is practicing the fine art of “loving your neighbor.”

Kudos to her!

[Part 2 tomorrow]

Perspective from the 19^th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

Name one inter-personal credential often missing in the United States today.

Okay, I will.

Empathy.

Which is embodied in the headline I used for this blog, borrowing an opinion piece from the New York Times written by columnist David French who worries that empathy is dying.

I do, too.

So, before including excerpts from what French wrote, what does the word empathy mean?

Simply this:  “The ability to understand and share the feelings of another.”

Said a different way, empathy means to put yourself in someone else’s shoes so you’ll understand more about them than you would otherwise.

Empathy is different, and more profound, than sympathy.  In the latter, you try to feel what someone else is feeling, so you express sympathy for them.  With empathy, you actually put yourself in the other person’s position and thus convey more than just neutral understanding.

To many in the world of Donald Trump, empathy is a weakness.  Not a strength.

A year ago this month, French said he wrote a newsletter warning about a new trend from what he and others call  “the MAGA Christian right.”  Some supposedly Christian theologians and influencers had begun warning about the ‘sin of empathy’ or ‘toxic empathy.’

“In books, essays, podcasts and speeches, prominent Christian influencers, ministers and theologians sounded the alarm that secular progressives were leading Christians astray by appealing to their emotions at the expense of their reason.

“The version of their case goes like this:

“Progressives have turned Christians’ soft hearts against hard truths.  Progressives have persuaded all too many Christians that the suffering of, say, undocumented immigrants or women facing unwanted pregnancies should override their concerns about the economic and social costs of large-scale immigration, or their compassion for victims of crimes committed by immigrants, or their concerns about the plight of the unborn child.

“Sometimes, as the argument goes, you have to do tough, hard things.  That means mass deportation.  That means cutting off aid to the poor and vulnerable in the developing world.  That means ending gay marriage even if it breaks up families.  And that means the strictest possible pro-life laws, even when the life or physical health of the mother might be at stake, or sending mothers to jail for aborting their child.”

While Trump and his ilk practice anti-empathy, French adds that many of us also are often unwilling to place ourselves in other people’s shoes, to try to understand who they are and what their lives are like.

More from French:

“It’s hard to talk about this issue without recognizing a fundamental truth of the moment:  The attack on empathy would have gained very little traction in the church if Trump weren’t president.  He delights in vengeance, and he owes his presidency to the evangelical church.  [Based on polls on voting in the last presidential election.]

“But this problem extends well beyond public policy into the fundamental cruelty and callousness of the culture of the new right.  It is no coincidence that the attack on empathy correlates with an extraordinary rise in blatant racism, antisemitism, and Islamophobia on the right.”

To French, empathy stands as a firewall against bigotry.

“But it’s more than that — it can also free you from bigotry.  Understanding another person’s experience and imagining if it happened to you softens our hearts and creates human connection.”

To this, I add hearty agreement.

It is worth displaying empathy as a citizen these days and even more so if you are a real Christian.

Perspective from the 19^th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

The appeal referred to in this blog headline – finding what I call the “middle ground” – came this week from an interesting source, none other than U.S. Supreme Justice Neil M. Gorsuch.

He wrote an opinion concurring with the major one authored by Supreme Court Chief Justice John Robert as it overthrew Donald Trump’s unilateral decisions to impose tariffs – read taxes – without Congressional approval.

The New York Times put it this way:  “…after the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s tariffs, it included a paean to Congress that read like a requiem for a bygone era of legislative power.”

Gorsuch wrote this:

“Yes, legislating can be hard and take time.  And yes, it can be tempting to by-pass Congress when some pressing problem arises.  But the deliberative nature of the legislative process was the whole point of its design.  Through that process, the nation can tap the combined wisdom of the people’s elected representatives, not just that of one faction or man.”

The Times added that what Gorsuch wrote “was a description of governing completely at odds with what is currently underway across the street from the Supreme Court at the Capitol, where Republicans controlling the House and the Senate have ceded their power to one man — Trump — on a variety of issues. In essence, they are acting as if they have no wisdom to tap, or no business doing so.”

Interesting that the words came from Gorsuch, a Trump appointee and one supposedly of a conservative block of justices on the court.  Which indicates that it often is difficult for anyone to predict how justices will vote on major issues.

Though he doesn’t know me from Adam – nor should he – Gorsuch’s words struck a chord with me because I have long advocated for what the preamble to this blog mentions – the idea of government in the middle ground.

Sadly, the business of finding that middle ground – call it compromise – is missing from government these days, especially at the federal level.

My fond hope is that, at some point in the future, government will return to the art of making solid public policy in the middle.

Perspective from the 19^th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

I ask the question in this blog headline based on my 40 years in and around government in Oregon, as well as my position as someone interested in local, statewide, regional and national politics in my retirement years.

What happened to government and politics?

Well, the best answer is that Donald Trump took office for the second term and turned politics – at least national politics, if not politics around the states – on its head. 

Compromise. 

Agreement. 

Consensus. 

They appear no longer to exist.

It used to be that persons who disagreed could find a way to work with each other.  I call this “the ability to disagree agreeably.”

At the Capitol in Salem where I was a lobbyist for 25 years, it often was the case that, when legislators disagreed as they considered pieces of legislation in committee or on the floors of the House and Senate, they then put aside those disagreements to have dinner together after hours.

Today?

No longer.

Disagreements often produce invective, name-calling, and hatred, even at the Capitol in Salem where minority Republicans chafe under majority Democrat control.

Democrats have not found a way to work with Republicans.  Reverse it and the same is true.

If someone disagrees with you, it is likely that you and they go into hate mode.

Even though it’s true that the best solutions to public policy challenges usually lie somewhere in the middle, not on either the right or left extreme.

Rather than just reinforce my long-time admiration for the “middle ground” (as stated in the introduction to this blog), I decided to turn to Mr. Google for more information this morning.  Here is what I found:

“Compromise in modern politics is essential for functioning democracy, yet it is increasingly rare due to high polarization and incentives that favor partisan brinkmanship over negotiation.

“While a 2025 Gallup poll shows 47 per cent of Americans favor leaders compromising to achieve results, political, ideological, and voter pressures frequently lead to legislative gridlock. 

“Many Americans may support compromise in principle, but this often conflicts with a desire for leaders to stick to strict partisan principles.”

Of course, normal partisan differences always play a role, but for me, partisanship should not rule the day.  Campaigning for office in the next election is different from governing. 

High-stakes political environments and fear of primary election punishments lead many lawmakers to adopt what has been called an “uncompromising mindset,” which is characterized by tenacity to one’s own point-of-view, as well as mistrust of the opposing party.

So, I say, now as many times before, “compromise” is not a dirty word.  And I hope it returns soon to politics.  If or when it does, we’ll all be better for it.

Let me add this conclusion.  I used to trust government, even as those in government made mistakes.  Today, I am not sure that you can trust anything done, especially at the federal level under Trump.

He and those who work for him want what’s best for themselves, not for the country.  They lie to get what they want.  And, if they win, so much the better.  Today, I am not sure that trust is possible any longer. 

Perspective from the 19^th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

In La Quinta, California, I play at a golf course, The Palms, that has been described as “a place for pure golf.”

Why?

Well, there are reasons for this description, which I have found to be accurate over the seven years I have spent my winters in La Quinta rather than in my #1 home, Salem, Oregon.

The reasons:

• There are no tee times at The Palms in La Quinta.  Rather, a golf pro always sits on the 1^st tee and works in groups ready to play.  But you have to get there to get in the queue.

• The goal for time in an 18-hole round is three hours and 30 minutes.  But it is often possible to play in a shorter amount of time if you put your mind to it – without running between shots.  By contrast, on many “resort courses” in the California desert, playing 18-holes can take as many as five hours.

• Always put your cell phones on silent and don’t look at them while you play at The Palms because this is….well, pure golf, not one allowing distractions. 

And, with a nod to purity, I also like to play golf at The Palms because of the friendships I have made there…with other golfers who appreciate the pace-of-play and the vistas on one of the best courses in La Quinta.

So, with this, I guess I’ll head out to play golf again.   But, first, I’ll cite a piece of good news from The Palms.

One of my friends achieved two major objectives in one round last week.  He got his first hole-in-one and also broke 80 for the first time, shooting 79.

I asked him which achievement he liked best.  He said the 79.

I would have said the reverse because I know he’ll shoot 79 again but may not get another hole-in-one, as difficult as those are to achieve in golf.  Still, two great achievements in one round.

Perspective from the 19^th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

As a political junkie in the years since my retirement, I have enjoyed reading various political columnists, with a changing recipe of favorites from time to time.

Now, one of my favorites is Frank Bruni, who with excellent words that flow into sentences, has an ability to skewer politicians for their misdeeds.  So, it is natural that he has a new target in Donald Trump and sycophants who work for him such as Pam Bondi, who has a title she doesn’t deserve, Attorney General of the United States of America.

I used the headline over the most recent Bruni column for this blog.

Before citing some of the Bruni’s words about Bondi, etc., here is a little background on him.

Born in 1964, he now writes for the New York Times, taking there a wide range of assignments, including a stint, of all things, as chief restaurant critic.  In 2011, he was named an op-ed columnist  and also joined Duke University as professor of the Practice of Journalism and Public Policy.  He is still there and writes his column from that location.

Here is how Bruni started his most recent column:

“I imagine Pam Bondi getting ready for one of her appearances on Capitol Hill by practicing in front of a mirror.  She hones her glare.  She perfects her sneer.  She rehearses her lines, such as they are.

“’Washed-up, loser lawyer!’ That’s for Representative Jamie Raskin, Democrat of Maryland.  What the phrase lacks in poetry it makes up for in pithiness.  It’s just four short words, two of them conveniently conjoined with a hyphen.  Even Bondi can remember that much.

“’Failed politician!’  That’s for Representative Thomas Massie, Republican of Kentucky.  Two words.  Insults are all about efficiency.

“But it’s not Bondi’s script that matters most.  It’s her voice, and the attorney general got the tone of it — the poison in it — just right when she spat those put-downs at those men during her, um, testimony before a House panel last week.  She didn’t merely ooze contempt.  She gushed it, so that all she communicated during more than four hours of nasty exchanges was how loathsome she found her interrogators.  Which was obviously her goal.  Her mission.”

So, Bruni wonders — and so do I why –Trump and his ilk “perform” this way and why their act engenders favor from some American.  Bruni answers his own question.

“I can’t get it out of my mind.  But then I never stopped thinking about Bondi’s identical performance before a Senate panel last October.  Both crystallized what is arguably the defining trait of the second Trump administration, a bearing and a bullying that cast a noxious haze over all public discourse, which was already plenty polluted.

“This crew — Bondi, Stephen Miller, J.D. Vance, President Trump himself — don’t want to win opponents’ favor.  They don’t even want to win the argument.  Why sweat the delicate art of persuasion when you can use the brute force of condemnation?  Comity and conciliation are a slog.  They’re for suckers.  Contempt is victors’ ready, heady prerogative.”

I wish I could have put together words such as this.  They describe Trump and his clowns perfectly.

“…Trump, his aides and many of his supporters haven’t purged contempt from our politics.  They’ve mainstreamed it.  Purified it.  Industrialized it.  It’s their push-a-button pushback against everyone who challenges them and any circumstances that threaten to undermine them, an all-purpose way to pivot from the substance of a situation to an evasive and obfuscating ill will.  Envelop everything in indiscriminate animosity and nothing real survives.”

So it is that I cannot wait for three more years to elapse.  Those are the years Trump will be in power in the presidency.

I hope we and our country can survive.

Postscript:  Another reason why I like Bruni is that, at the end of every column, he includes examples of great writing from newspapers around the country.  The examples have been sent by Bruni readers who, like me, love words.  So, I am looking for great writing to send along to Bruni.