FREDDIE COUPLES SMASHES GOLF STIGMA WITH NEW CLUB SET-UP

Perspective from the 19th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

Freddie Couples and I have something in common.

No, not great golf.

It’s just that, given our respective old ages – I am about 10 years older than Freddie – the clubs in our golf bags look the same.

I found this out when I read one of my regular on-line golf magazines.

Here is how the article started.

“Telltale signs of aging:  Gray hair, balky back, golf bag filled with hybrids.

“These days, Fred Couples checks all those boxes.  But even at 64, with a silver mane, assorted aches and pains, and a much slower swing speed than he once possessed, the famously laidback veteran retains his youthful spirit.  And he’s not too proud to poke fun at himself.”

Poking fun involves admitting that he carries a lot of hybrids.

I do, too. 

Freddie’s longest iron in his bag is a 7.  Mine is a 6.

More from the golf magazine:

“With a camera on him as he stands in the fairway of the par-4 8th hole, Couples is asked about the arsenal of woods and hybrids he now carries. Six altogether.

“’Everyone keeps talking about ‘em,’ he says of his newly configured setup.  Other golfers might be embarrassed.  Couples simply shrugs off the stigma.  ‘I’m like, so my longest iron is a 7. Who cares?’”

Age drains distance from every golfer’s game – including mine — and, as Couples detailed at the Masters earlier this year, long and mid-irons are also no good for his balky back.

At one point, informed by his caddie that he had 177 yards remaining to the green, Couples didn’t hesitate in club selection.

“’A little 6-rescue for the boys,’ he says before flushing an approach that earns the approval of his playing partner, Jay Haas.  ‘6?’ Haas asks.

“’6-rescue,” Couples replies.  ‘Better than the 5.  You know, I couldn’t hit that with a 6-iron.  I’m not strong enough anymore. I hate to say that.’”

Like Freddie, I don’t much like having to admit that I cannot hit clubs the same distance as I used to years ago. 

But, the salvation is that, at my advanced, I am still on the golf course – hybrids and all!

So, Freddie and me, together still!

IS CRITICISM ON KAMALA HARRIS’ SUPPOSED LACK OF POLICY WARRANTED?  I THINK NOT!

Perspective from the 19th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

To the question in this blog headline, I answer “no.”

So does Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont.  He said so in a letter to the editor of the Wall Street Journal yesterday – and I agree with him.

This arose, at least in part, because of a column written for the Journal by Peggy Noonan, who does a good job normally.  Not this time.

She averred that Harris is short on policy, which prompted Lamont to write.

Of course, one of the underlying questions is whether voters cast ballots based on policy or character – or something else.  For me and Lamont, character is more important than policy because solid character can lead to solid policy.

On this count, Harris stands head and shoulders above Donald Trump who wouldn’t know a policy if it hit him in the face.

Enough from me, at least for the moment. 

Lamont started his letter this way:

“I love Peggy Noonan, but let me posit a counter to her column “Kamala Harris Is an Artless Dodger” (Declarations, September 21). She says that Donald Trump vs. Kamala Harris is a race between awful and empty.  

“Columnists have belittled the purity of presidential candidates forever; the Abraham Lincoln vs. Stephen Douglas Senate race was slammed as a choice between the better of two evils. Really?

“I won’t opine on awful, but let me speak to empty.  Noonan says that Vice President Harris lacks specifics because she doesn’t know, doesn’t care or doesn’t want you to know.”

Lamont they listed policies Harris advocates – and the list is good one because it counters the notion from columnist Noonan and others that Harris is light on policy.

From Lamont:

  • On foreign policy, I know where she stands on arming the Ukrainian freedom fighters.  Former President Trump says end the war on day one — whatever that means — but I would wait to find out if I were Vladimir Putin.  Harris knows that working with our allies makes America stronger; Trump, not so much.
  • On trade, Harris wants to bring our supply chains closer to home, especially with national-security assets, and toughen our negotiating position with adversaries like China and Russia.  Trump’s tariffs would punish friend and foe alike, and Americans will pay the price.
  • Noonan characterizes the Harris “economic opportunity tour” as an evasive dodge.  I believe that most of us understand it to mean that the era of free money is over, but that the Harris Administration will help you get the skills for a better job and make it easier to start a business or own a home.
  • We know where Harris stands on immigration.  She understands the value of legal immigration and wants more tools from Congress to fight illegal immigration.  As with trade and our allies, where Trump doesn’t know the difference between friend and foe, he doesn’t like immigration — period.  “They’re poisoning the blood our country,” he said.

Lamont then asks and answers the question that lurks behind any presidential campaign.  Are we better off today than we were four years ago?  

Lamont’s answer:

“Four years ago, the economy was in the ditch and stores were boarded up, with sage brush blowing down empty streets and big unemployment.  Blame it all on Covid, then acknowledge that some of the comeback inflation was Covid-related as well, but we are better off than four years ago, and Harris can argue that we are only getting started.

“I think we know the difference between awful and not-so-empty.

Noonan argues that Harris spends too much time on biography — who she is, why she is and why she believes what she does.”

Lamont disagrees, saying that Harris’ biography is part of what commends her to Americans.  

Then, to end, Lamont makes a great point, one with which I absolutely agree:

“I still make a laundry list of candidates’ positions on everything from tax rates to prescription-drug prices, but as the years march on, I put more and more emphasis on character.

“Teddy Roosevelt is reputed to have said, ‘Nobody cares how much you know until they know how much you care.’  We know a lot about both candidates on the issues and on character.

“Let’s vote.”

ON NO, IT’S TIME FOR GOLF COURSE AERIFICATION AGAIN!

Perspective from the 19th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

If you look in the dictionary, it’s hard to find the word “aerification.”

Perhaps it’s a made-up word, but all golfers know what it means.

The golf course will be closed to play for about a week!

But what is aerification really?  To get more information, I looked up the process in materials provided by the United States Golf Association (USGA).  Without going into ultimate detail, here is what I found:

“The USGA’s Green Section has been helping golf courses deliver the best possible playing conditions for nearly 100 years.  USGA agronomists work with golf facilities across North America to help them create and maintain environmentally and economically sustainable golf courses that give you the best playing experience, even if you have to occasionally play on aerated putting greens. 

“Aerating putting greens might create a short-term disruption in your game, but the long-term benefits greatly outweigh the inconvenience. Here are five things every golfer to know:

  1. We aerate to improve, not annoy

Putting greens receive more traffic than any other playing surface.  The aeration process helps relieve the compaction caused by all that traffic.  It also helps create a firm, smooth putting surface by controlling thatch and promoting healthy turf roots.

  • Scratch the thatch

Thatch is a layer of old plant material that accumulates at the soil surface. If thatch on putting greens is not diluted by aeration and topdressing, it will act like a sponge, holding water near the surface.  Excessive thatch creates soft playing conditions, inconsistent green speeds ,and increases the risk of disease.

  • Timing is everything

Do you ever wonder why aeration is commonly performed when putting greens are playing their best?  Aerating when grass is healthy and actively growing minimizes damage and allows for a quick return to optimal playing conditions.  Aerating at other times may be more convenient for the golf schedule, but it lengthens recovery times, increases the risk of an invasion of weeds and could cause lasting damage. 

It may seem like there are more holes than grass on the putting greens right after they’ve been aerated, but this is an illusion. Typically, aeration affects less than 10 percent of a putting surface.

  • Sand is part of the plan

A heavy application of top-dressing following aeration may appear to make putting greens less playable.  However, filling aeration holes with sand actually helps create a smoother surface.  Sand also creates channels for water and air movement, dilutes thatch and helps putting greens recover from aeration more quickly.

Now, to this I add that on the course where I play most of my golf, Illahe Hills Golf and Country Club in Salem, Oregon, aerification does not occur only on the greens.  It is also done on the fairways and tee boxes.

Overall, the current process went well, except for the fact that some equipment broke, a fact-of-life for any greens superintendent.

I have seen all of this in my forty or so years of playing golf, so I am used to it.  And, this weekend, with my golf course open for the first time in a week, I may go play in the sandbox.

J.D. VANCE SAYS HIS DISHONESTY HAS A PURPOSE, A CRAZY ONE

Perspective from the 19th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

Here is a follow-up to what I wrote yesterday about Donald Trump and J.D. Vance who are telling lies after lies.

Besides that, Vance has admitted that he “creates” stories to generate media attention.

A far better word would be “concocts.”

He was proud of admitting that the concocted the story he told about Haitian immigrants eating local cats and dogs in Springfield, Ohio, so the media would pay attention.

Here is what he told the New York Times:

Vance Sticks By Pet-Eating Claims and Says He’s Willing to ‘Create Stories

“Vance, who amplified false claims that Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio, were eating pets, said he was willing ‘to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention.’

There. 

Vance admits to his dishonesty, citizens in Ohio, those he “sort of represents” be damned. 

To him, the end justifies the means.

“A LIE CAN TRAVEL HALFWAY AROUND THE WORLD WHILE THE TRUTH IS STILL PUTTING ON ITS SHOES” – MARK TWAIN SAID IT

Perspective from the 19th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

Call me befuddled.

For two reasons.

  • First, don’t you like the word.  Even the sound of it is welcome, giving a hint of what it means.
  • Second, it relates to my status as I watch certain politicians – not all, but certain ones – practice the art of lying to advance their cause. 

Let me name them – Donald Trump and J.D. Vance.

Lying is their stock in trade.  They do naturally.

And what befuddles me [by the way, here’s the definition — make (someone) unable to think clearly] is that many Americans believe the lies.

Mark Twain may have it best with this quote:  “A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes.”

Regarding Trump, when The Washington Post Fact Checker team first started cataloguing his false or misleading claims, it recorded 492 suspect claims in the first 100 days of his presidency.  On November 2 alone, the day before the 2020 vote, Trump made 503 false or misleading claims as he barnstormed across the country in a desperate effort to win re-election.

Fact Checker reported this astonishing fact:  By the end of his term, Trump had accumulated 30,573 untruth — averaging about 21 erroneous claims a day.

So, as I pondered these facts again, I also read a long story in the Wall Street Journal.  To its credit, the newspaper sent three reporters to Springfield, Ohio to check out first-hand on Trump’s and Vance’s latest lie – that Haitian immigrants in Springfield were eating cats and dogs owned by residents in that city.

At the risk of a long blog today, I am reprinting the full Wall Street Journal story because it lays out in detail the Trump and Vance have fomented the issue for their own political gain.  It shows how a lie, an intentional one, almost becomes the truth, at least apparently in the minds of some who hear it often enough.

Pursuant to the Journal story, I formulated my own notions of why lying has a chance to work in some sectors of politics.

  • If a disreputable politician tells a lie often enough, then it becomes almost like the truth.  As writer David French put it the other day, hearing something often enough produces gullibility.
  • A lie mimics something you already tend to believe, no matter the truth or fiction of it, so you the believe the lie, too.
  • A lie mimics the distrust you may feel toward government, even if that distrust if not fully earned by government.  You want to get back at government for what it has done to you, so the lie makes sense.
  • A lie, if told by someone who then follows up with a plea to fight, then that also mimics instincts of those who want to fight rather than talk.
  • A lie underlines the notion that compromise is a dirty word.  For those who eschew compromise, the only solution is to give them what they want every time at all costs.

The Journal summarized things this way:  “Lying is really an economy.  Politicians lie because they think it pays off.”

Here is the Wall Street Journal article.

*********

HOW THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN RAN WITH RUMORS ABOUT PET-EATING MIGRANTS—AFTER BEING TOLD THEY WEREN’T TRUE

Springfield, Ohio, city officials were contacted by D. J. Vance’s vice presidential team and said the claims were baseless.  It didn’t matter and now the town is in chaos.

By Kris Maher, Valerie Bauerlein, and Tawnell D. Hobbs

September 18, 2024 12:01 am ET

In an instant, the everyday struggles of a typical American city grappling with an influx of immigrants were transformed into a bombshell political message laser targeted at voters distressed by immigration.

It was the culmination of a spectacular collision of forces that thrust Springfield into the heart of the U.S. presidential election. Over the summer, outside neo-Nazi groups—which specialize in exploiting local controversy to foment outrage about migrants—had seized on a local controversy and fanned the narrative of pet-eating Haitians.

Then the Trump campaign blasted those rumors to the world—and kept pushing them even after they were exposed as lies. The Trump campaign continues to run hard at the controversy.

Trump last Friday said he planned “large deportations” from Springfield—whose Haitian community is overwhelmingly in the country legally. Trump campaign surrogate Vivek Ramaswamy plans to host a town hall in Springfield this Thursday. Vance said on Tuesday that Trump would like to visit Springfield, too, at some point. 

Attempts to contain the damage in Springfield were quickly overwhelmed despite city leaders’ racing from meeting to meeting trying to stem the tide. The Ohio state police were called in to protect local children as they returned to school. A security tower with cameras was erected outside City Hall.

Thirty-six bomb threats had been logged as of Tuesday evening.

“It induces panic and fear and depletes resources,” said Heck, the city manager. “We’re living the danger that misinformation and created stories leads to.”

“We have told those at the national level that they are speaking these things that are untrue,” added Springfield Mayor Rob Rue, a registered Republican. But he said claims have been “repeated and doubled down on.” 

Vance insisted on CNN this past Sunday that he had firsthand accounts of the incidents from constituents, but the media had paid no attention to migrant problems in American cities “until Donald Trump and I started talking about cat memes.” He added, “If I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then that’s what I’m going to do.”

Ripe for exploitation

Springfield was a community that had all the ingredients to be exploited in a close, fiercely fought national election.

It’s in the middle of the middle of the U.S., with a name so generically American it was used in the classic sitcoms “Father Knows Best” and “The Simpsons.”

The town sprung up along the Old National Road, the first highway built by the federal government. From the beginning, it was a place of immigrants: first the Irish, who traveled the road westward in the early 1800s, then the Germans, who founded the town’s flagship Wittenberg University in the 1840s, and eventually a wave of Black Americans fleeing the South in the mid-20th century. 

This recent wave of Haitian immigrants was initially welcomed. The town’s fortunes had declined alongside those of the rest of the Rust Belt, with the population dropping from 83,000 in 1960 to 59,000 in 2020.

The pandemic created a crunch in the available labor force as many workers stayed home out of choice or necessity, collecting stimulus checks. 

Haitians were fleeing danger in their increasingly lawless country, particularly after the assassination of their president in 2021.

In Springfield, they were welcomed by evangelical groups and employers alike. Friends and family members followed loved ones there. 

Springfield

Estimates of the number of immigrants vary, but Republican Governor Mike DeWine said Monday that roughly 15,000 Haitians immigrated to Springfield over the past four years. They were able to immigrate legally under a Biden administration policy granting Temporary Protected Status to Haitians as part of a program created by Congress in 1990 to protect immigrants from countries deemed too dangerous to return to.

The local economy boomed. Business owners said they were grateful to have workers eager to work long shifts and do what it took to meet production goals. New subdivisions sprung up in the cornfields outside town. New restaurants opened. The Haitian flag flew at City Hall. 

Growth came with growing pains. The number of non-native English speakers in the public schools quadrupled to more than 1,000 children. The local clinic and hospital were overwhelmed with people fleeing a country where healthcare had been scant. Traffic increased, as did frustration with drivers more accustomed with the chaotic streets of Port-au-Prince than the orderly grid of Springfield.

Then tragedy struck at the start of school in 2023. A minivan driven by a Haitian immigrant crashed into a school bus, injuring 20 children and killing Aiden Clark, who was thrown from a window. The man didn’t have a driver’s license that was valid in the U.S.

Aiden was memorialized in an obituary as a kid who loved gardening with his father, snuggling with his mother and playing with his siblings, and overall was “one of the most awesome and exceptional 11-year-olds in existence.”

His death brought out conflict about immigration. City commission meetings once dominated by zoning petitions became extended public comment sessions on immigration. Suspicions grew about who might be benefiting from the migrant wave.

After one city commission meeting, an evangelical pastor named Carl Ruby, who ran an “immigrant integration” not-for-profit organization, sought out a local GOP leader who had criticized him online. Ruby said he shook the hand of Mark Sanders, who had become a leading critic in town of the influx of immigrants—and wouldn’t let go until he agreed to meet. 

They met and drank coffee at Panera for an hour and a half.

Ruby offered to share tax documents for his organization that would dispel rumors he was getting rich from his non-profit. He also said he didn’t own rental properties or benefit from a local employment agency that has employed Haitians, as had been rumored.

Sanders, who has likened Ruby to a “coyote” who makes money from helping people cross into the U.S. illegally, agreed to take down some of his online posts but the two men haven’t spoken since. 

“I think he believed me, but I don’t think it fits his narrative,” Ruby said. He’s not interested in another get-together. “Logic and truth just don’t matter at this point to that group.” 

Sanders, a retired engineer, had started working as a school bus driver to comfort his daughter, who had been scared to get back on the bus after Aiden Clark’s death. He said he would be open to another meeting because he believes he can show ways that the Haitians have hurt the city. “I can show you the detriments,” he said. “Show me the benefits.” 

White supremacists arrive

Springfield’s growing tensions caught the attention of outside hate groups, seeking division to exploit.

White supremacist groups have been active in towns across the U.S. this summer, inserting themselves into hot-button debates over immigration, Gaza and gay rights, according to the Anti-Defamation League. These groups rallied in places like Tallahassee, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and Nashville, at times calling for deportation of immigrants. 

On August 10, a group wearing ski masks and carrying swastika flags and rifles marched in Springfield. The ADL identified them as Blood Tribe, which it describes as a growing neo-Nazi group claiming to have chapters across the U.S. and Canada.

On August 27, during the routine public-comment portion of the Springfield City Commission meeting, a man identifying himself as a Blood Tribe member said: “I’ve come to bring a word of warning. Stop what you’re doing before it’s too late. Crime and savagery will only increase with every Haitian you bring in.”

Rue, the mayor, interrupted him, saying “You sound threatening to me,” and asking police to peacefully remove him.

And recently, roughly 20 individuals claiming to represent the Proud Boys marched in the town. 

Springfield NAACP President Denise Williams said residents are on edge from visits by the groups. “I’m saying to our people near and far to please stand down and don’t approach these guys—they are armed,” she said. “It’s quite dangerous.” 

It goes national

Much of this had gone on without the rest of the U.S. noticing. That was about to change.

The cat-eating rumors, started with a post by a Springfield woman on a private Facebook page, turned out to be third-hand and were subsequently disavowed by the original poster, according to NewsGuard, a company that tracks online misinformation.

After Vance’s tweets on the morning of September 10, Springfield Mayor Rue called a press conference that afternoon to try to contain the damage.

He also was faced that evening with the pain that Vance’s tweet was causing locally.

Along with promoting the pet-eating rumor, Vance’s post had said a Springfield “child was murdered by a Haitian migrant who had no right to be here.”

That night, Nathan Clark — the father of Aiden, the boy who had been killed in the bus crash — spoke during the public-comment portion of the Springfield City Commission meeting. Visibly shaking, he referenced GOP politicians, including Vance, and said they had used his son’s death “for political gain.”

“I wish that my son Aiden Clark was killed by a 60-year-old white man,” he said. “I bet you never thought anyone would ever say something so blunt.” 

Hours later, Trump uttered the line that launched countless memes. He was called on it in the moment, when ABC debate moderator David Muir said his outlet had checked with Springfield’s city manager and found there were no credible reports of pets being harmed by immigrants.

Trump responded that the city manager would be expected to say that, but he’d seen people saying the opposite on TV.  

“It is depressing as a fact checker,” said Bill Adair, founder of the fact-checking website PolitiFact and a professor at Duke University. “We like to think that fact-checks will stop elected officials and candidates from repeating false claims or at least persuade people that these false claims have no truth to them.” 

But, he noted, “lying is really an economy. Politicians lie because they think it pays off.”

The fallout

The morning after the debate, parents in Springfield kept their children home en masse. Several schools, City Hall and the state motor vehicle offices in Springfield were forced to evacuate after receiving bomb threats. The city canceled its two-day CultureFest celebrating diversity, arts and culture “in light of recent threats and safety concerns.”

Blood Tribe took a victory lap for its presence in the town, boasting on September 11, “We are on the ground in Springfield weekly—we even showed up to their City Council Meeting.” 

Vance, meanwhile, has continued to defend his claims.

A Vance spokesperson on Tuesday provided The Wall Street Journal with a police report in which a resident had claimed her pet might have been taken by Haitian neighbors. But when a reporter went to Anna Kilgore’s house Tuesday evening, she said her cat Miss Sassy, which went missing in late August, had actually returned a few days later—found safe in her own basement. 

Kilgore, wearing a Trump shirt and hat, said she apologized to her Haitian neighbors with the help of her daughter and a mobile-phone translation app.

Vance has also added to his claims about Haitians, saying on social media that communicable diseases have been on the rise in Springfield because of the Haitian migration. 

Information from the county health department, however, shows a decrease in infectious disease cases countywide, with 1,370 reported in 2023—the lowest since 2015. The tuberculosis case numbers in the county are so low (four in 2023, three in 2022, one in 2021) that any little movement can bring a big percentage jump. HIV cases did increase to 31 in 2023, from 17 in 2022 and 12 in 2021. Overall, sexually transmitted infection cases decreased to 965 in 2023, the lowest since 2015.

On Monday, Rue and DeWine appeared together on the heels of a roundtable at which other Ohio mayors appeared in solidarity with Springfield.

The governor said some of the bomb threats were clearly meant to sow division, and originated from a foreign country he didn’t name. DeWine also said he has great affinity for the people of Haiti, which he has visited at least 25 times, most commonly in support of a school for poor children named after his late daughter Becky DeWine, who died in a car crash at age 22.

In recent days, many in Springfield have gone out of their way to show support for their Haitian neighbors, including by frequenting Haitian-run restaurants. Still, the local Haitian community is on edge. 

Stanley Thelusma, 24, who arrived in Springfield in July from Haiti, sought a peaceful spot at Snyder Park on Tuesday afternoon, studying a biology textbook on his iPad while people played pickleball and kids ran through a splash park nearby.

He wasn’t far from a pond where Haitians had been rumored to have taken some of the park’s geese and slaughtered them, a rumor the state wildlife division found no basis for. Similarly, the mayor said the sheriff had checked 11 months of 911 calls and found no evidence of animal abuse among the Haitian community.

Thelusma said he had hoped to continue his medical studies in Port-au-Prince but that he and his parents decided to come to Springfield because of the threat of gang violence. Now he is in a nursing degree program part-time at Clark State College and works four days a week as a forklift driver at an Amazon facility 30 minutes away, earning $19.50 an hour.

“I don’t know why people are talking about immigrants eating cats, some pets,” he said. “It’s totally false.” 

WHAT MATTERS IN A PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN?  CHARACTER OR SUBSTANCE

Perspective from the 19th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

If you are involved or interested in politics – even from the cheap seats out West where I live – you can answer the question in this blog headline.

The answer:  Both.

But, for me, character matters first and, if character is sound, perhaps not perfect, but sound, then substance matters more.  If character is missing or derelict, then substance hardly matters.

As for the presidential election this time around, it is not hard for me to support Kamala Harris based on one word – character.

Her character is sound and her opponent, Donald Trump, is far from sound, even perhaps mentally ill as he aggrandizes himself and criticizes everybody else.  Everybody else!

Washington Post political analyst Dan Balz, one of the most experienced hands with such a job, put it this way recently:

“Former president Trump has long inhabited a bizarre world of his own creation.  He re-writes history — or makes it up entirely — to aggrandize himself, denigrate others, and spread the basest of lies.”

Back to the point about Harris and policy.

Writing in the New York Times, Brent Stephens said this:

“It should not be hard for Harris to demonstrate that she can give detailed answers to urgent policy questions.  Or to express a sense, beyond a few canned phrases, of how she sees the American interest in a darkening world.

“Or to articulate a politics of genuine inclusion that reaches out to tens of millions of distrustful voters.  Or to prove that she’s more than another factory-settings liberal Democrat whose greatest virtue, like her greatest fault, is that she won’t step too far from the conventional wisdom.”

For my part, Stephens, at least in this column, goes too far.

He wants Harris to articulate specific policy positions which, if she does, would not redound necessarily to her credit politically.

That’s because she is opposing Trump, the darkest character in American politics, though perhaps his surrogate vice president candidate, J.D. Vance, comes close.  Who knows what Trump’s policies are, except that he hates anyone who doesn’t salute him?

The fact is that Harris has laid a number of policies she favors –strengthening the economy and reducing consumer prices, a heavy emphasis on reproductive rights and abortion, and what she would do in the face of international crises, including wars in Ukraine and the Middle East.

Meanwhile, as I tried to figure out the mind of American voters the other day – a tough and lonely task — I wrote a series of questions for myself, then answered them.

Here they are.

Would you vote for a person who had been convicted of rape?

Answer:  No.

Would you vote for a person who had been found guilty of crimes for paying hush money to a porn star – in other words, for a convicted felon?

Answer:  No.

Would you vote for person who sequestered sensitive, confidential documents from the White House and left them to be looked at by anyone at his resort in Florida?

Answer:  No.

Would you vote for someone who called a mob into play after he lost an election, then did not urge them to stand down as they assaulted the U.S. Capitol, including injuring police officers – in other words, someone guilty of sedition?

Answer:  No.

Would you vote for someone who has promised to release everyone convicted of a crime at the U.S. Capitol as these soon-to-felons worked to overthrow a fair election?

Answer:  No.

Would you vote for someone who denigrated military service, then wants to function as Commander in Chief?

Answer:  No.

Would you vote for someone who criticized military war hero John McCain “because McCain was captured?”

Answer:  No.

Would you vote for someone who said he would deport nearly all immigrants in the U.S.?

Answer:  No.

Would you vote for someone who wallows in a false report that immigrants eat dogs and cats when they arrive in U.S. cities?

Answer:  No.

Need this go any farther?

Answer:  No.

In terms of character, this question-answer is all anyone needs to know about the uncouth man who wants to be president again.

So, give room for Harris, in the closing weeks of the campaign, to articulate views on issues facing the American presidency, but, also, don’t lose sight of Trump’s huge character failings that ought to bar him from running.

And, recognize Harris’ strengths of character that ought to make her president.

ANOTHER ARCANE GOLF RULES ISSUE  —  THERE ARE MANY!

Perspective from the 19th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

Most of my friends know that, for some unknown reason, I like golf rules.

Perhaps because I want the challenge to understand rules that, based on how they are written by the United States Golf Association (USGA) and the R & A in Europe, often don’t make much sense.

Another arcane golf rule bubbled up the other day on the course where I play, Illahe Hills Golf and Country Club in Salem, Oregon.  It arose in a tournament for junior golfers.

Also, I suppose all golf rules are arcane, so perhaps it’s redundant to use that word as a way to describe the mystery of the rules.

Without much else to do in retirement, I researched the golf rules issue by heading toward the official rules publication, aided and abetted by Mr. Google.

The issue:  Is it ever possible to tee up your golf ball on consecutive shots?

Well, the answer doesn’t lend itself to a simple “yes” or “no.”  Of course, it is more complicated.

Here is what Mr. Google said.

“Good news for golfers who might (literally) struggle to get off the tee. Thanks to the USGA, we recently learned of a little-known rule in which you can tee up your ball on consecutive shots.

“Sound crazy?

“Just wait.

“In a video recently posted on the USGA’s Instagram, the governing body broke down the situation in which this scenario might come into play.

“For starters, to use this rule you need to top the ball.  Or sky it.  Or basically just hit it so poorly it doesn’t leave the ‘teeing area.’

“But you can make up for a bad swing by flexing your Rules of Golf knowledge and telling your buddies you can tee it up again for your second shot.

“Here’s how that works.

“First, you have to figure out if the swing counts.  If it was actually intended to be a practice swing — something we’ve seen a few times from none other than former U.S. Ryder Cup captain Zach Johnson — then you can simply tee it up and hit it again with no penalty.

“But, if you tried to hit the ball, then it counts. From the spot where the ball landed, even on the teeing ground, you are now hitting your second shot.

“But here’s the good news!

If the ball is still in the “tee box” — which is defined as the small box between the two tee markers and measuring two club-lengths back — then a player can pick it up and move it to anywhere within that teeing area.

“And, the kicker?  You can even tee it up for that second shot.”

The key here is the phrase “tee box.”  To repeat what’s above, that is the area between the two tee markers and measuring two club-lengths back.

The ball you just tried to hit cannot JUST be in the entire teeing area.  It has to be in the “tee box.”

If you think about it for only a second or two, it is almost impossible for this to happen.  Hit a tee shot, even poorly, and it ends up behind you a pace or two!

Not likely.

But, as this episode indicates, when you play golf, if you set your mind to it, you can learn something nearly every time.

And, this was true for me a couple days ago.

DONALD TRUMP TRIES TO CAPITALIZE POLITICALLY ON SECOND ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT

Perspective from the 19th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

Not much surprise here, I guess.

After a second assassination attempt, Donald Trump tried to capitalize on it for political gain.  His own.

And, of course, he blamed President Joe Biden, Vice President and presidential candidate Kamala Harris, and anyone else he think of, if thinking is what he actually does.

Tom Nichols, writing in The Atlantic magazine, put it this way:

“Every American has the right to participate in public life without violence, and that includes Donald Trump.

“Personally, I think he probably belongs in jail, but that is a matter for the justice system.  I also think he is easily the worst president in American history and one of the very worst people in our national life.  But my feelings have no bearing on his rights or his safety.

“He is an American, and I want him to be treated fairly in court.  He is my fellow citizen, and I want him to walk our streets without being in danger.  He is a candidate for public office in the United States, and I want our government to ensure his safety — I am willing to be taxed to pay for his security.” 

My views, exactly.

Nichols continues:

“If only Trump and his homunculus, J. D. Vance, cared as much about the safety of others as so many others care about theirs.”

As an aside, there was a new word for me in what Nichols wrote – homunculus.  I looked it up and it means “a very small human.”

Again, exactly.

Vance is bringing down misery on his own constituents in Ohio, using hatred against immigrants to set neighbors against one another, a conflict that has led to the closure of schools and the lockdown of two hospitals.

All for the supposed political benefit to him as he runs for vice president.  He has admitted that he “created” the story – that was the word he used, created – to generate media coverage pursuant to the false comment that immigrants are eating cats and dogs.  It was not and is not true.

More Nichols:

“Vance is a product of a working-class town, but, in reality, he is an utterly synthetic politician, a power-seeking drone who will do almost anything to further his political fortunes.  In this case, he is casting the innocent people of Springfield, Ohio, in his own obscene little drama about migrant savages roaming the streets of the heartland trying to sink their teeth into Fluffy and Fido.

“Sure, it’s a pack of lies, but it’s all for the greater good, you see, of advancing the career of the Hillbilly Senator.

“Trump, meanwhile, is turning the violence against him into fuel for more political hatred.  In July, a young man — a loner with no obvious political agenda — tried to kill Trump in Pennsylvania, and almost did.  And now another man is under arrest for a possible assassination attempt after being discovered near Trump’s golf course, apparently lying in wait for the former president.

“Once again, the suspect seems to be something of a weird loner who said on X that he voted for Trump in 2016, but in subsequent elections, according to federal campaign-finance records, began donating to Democrats.  

One might hope that these brushes with death would bring Trump a moment of reflection and, perhaps, even something like grace.  But if Trump were capable of such a response, he wouldn’t be the man he is.”

Trump is blaming two possible attempts to kill him on pretty much anyone who isn’t an open partisan on his side, and, as I wrote above, that includes Biden, Harris, and millions of other Americans.

Nichols concludes:

“Self-awareness is not part of Trump’s personality:  He is complaining about overheated rhetoric while constantly spewing such rhetoric himself.

We are a better country, and a better people, than Trump, and every good American citizen should insist on his protection and his safety.  But he and Vance seem unable to insist on ours — a fundamental duty of elected officials — and this makes them unfit to hold any American public office.”

Again, exactly.

A TOURNAMENT AT ILLAHE HILLS GOLF COURSE REPRESENTS DEDICATION TO THE IMPORTANCE OF JUNIOR GOLF

Perspective from the 19th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

As I write this, the Oregon Golf Association’s (OGA) final tournament of the season for golfers between 8 and 18 has just concluded in Salem, Oregon.

It was held at “my” home course, Illahe Hills Golf and Country Club, which, to its credit, agreed to host the event for the fourth year in a row.

Why?

In a phrase, “to support the future of golf!”

I say that as a 75-year-old golfer who is past his prime, if he had ever had a prime in the first place.

So, it’s good to see young players take up the game.

Everything went off without a hitch yesterday at Illahe.

That included the work of eight Illahe members who agreed to volunteer as “walking scorers” for the youngest players, those 8-9 and 10-11 years-of-age.  They play 9 holes as they to learn the game, whether they go on to play in high school or college or just love fold for rest of their lives.

One focus is to help players learn how to keep score in the only sport where players keep their own score.  Tournament scorecards are used and players serve as a “marker” for another player in their group, plus they record their own score.

Then, after each hole, they confirm the score with the walking scorer.  And, at the scoring table at the end of their 9-hole round, they sign the scorecard – the same process that occurs in tournaments for older players – as soon as they confirm that all 9 hole-by-hole scores are correct.

A good process, which in the case yesterday, relies on the good work of eight walking scorer volunteers.

When all is said and done, the main benefit of yesterday’s experience:  Young players represent the future of the game of golf and it is worth investing in their continued success.

IS IT HORSERACE POLITICS OR SUBSTANCE?

Perspective from the 19th Hole is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

On this Sunday, normally a “day of rest,” I cannot help myself but to write more about Donald Trump. 

He is such a buffoon – other words also may apply – that it is not possible for me to ignore him on this or any other day.

As I reported in advance of the presidential debate, I said I was not going to watch it, preferring to review quality newspaper reports afterwards.

So, based on reporting in the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, and the New York Times, I thought Kamala Harris scored a huge victory.  One analyst called it a “rout.”

Of course, Donald Trump thought otherwise because, as a narcissist, he can’t tolerate the thought of losing.

I can – and I hope losing for him relates, not just to the debate, but also to the coming election.

A debate win for Harris won’t mean that it, alone, will dictate the outcome, but it was a solid next step toward victory.

Even as I convey these notions, I also was struck by what Atlantic Magazine columnist, Tom Nichols, wrote recently

Here is how he started his column:

“I find it exhausting to have to point out that Donald Trump has — yet again — threatened to engage in violent and dictatorial behavior, and that — yet again — the collective reaction by some in America seems to be a numb acceptance that this is just who Trump is.

“…Trump’s goal is to exhaust people who care about democracy:  That’s why he regularly inundates the nation with his rancid word salads.  His screeds are aimed at making us all so tired that when he actually attempts to carry out these schemes, we’ll hardly have the energy to notice. 

“Oh, he’s ordering Homeland Security to arrest people in unconstitutional dragnets? Yeah, I’ve been hearing stuff about that for a long time.”

Here is part of what Nichols reports that Trump posted at his personal “rantatorium,” Truth Social:

“CEASE & DESIST: I, together with many Attorneys and Legal Scholars, am watching the Sanctity of the 2024 Presidential Election very closely because I know, better than most, the rampant Cheating and Skullduggery that has taken place by the Democrats in the 2020 Presidential Election.

“It was a Disgrace to our Nation! Therefore, the 2024 Election, where Votes have just started being cast, will be under the closest professional scrutiny and, WHEN I WIN, those people that CHEATED will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the Law, which will include long term prison sentences so that this Depravity of Justice does not happen again.”

First, I avoid mentioning the inappropriate capitalization, as well as the sorry syntax.

But, as Nichols points out, “This post is the 45th president of the United States putting in writing that he must win, and that after he wins, he will mobilize the machinery of government against his opponents because there was clearly fraud anyway.

“I will just note that I refuse to believe that Trump really coughed up a word like skulduggery on his own.  Spelling it incorrectly does point to him, but the likelihood that someone else is writing these posts is a reminder that Trump is surrounded by people who have no objections to his plans and will willingly carry them out.

“Some of this was drowned out by Trump’s other deranged statements last week. Just before he issued his Stalinist threats, he dropped a piece of pure weapons-grade nuttery about kids getting gender-changing surgery during a normal school day in America.

“;Can you imagine you’re a parent,’ he said at a rally in Wisconsin on Saturday, ‘and your son leaves the house and you say, ‘Jimmy, I love you so much. Go have a good day in school’ and your son comes back with a brutal operation.  Can you even imagine this?  What the hell is wrong with our country?”

Nichols says “you cannot imagine it because it’s never happened.  Any parent knows that most schools completely plotz if they even have to give a kid some ibuprofen, but on Planet Trump, school nurses can apparently do surgery in the office.

“At the same rally, Trump threatened to round up undocumented immigrants en masse and admitted it would be ‘bloody story.’

“To recap:  In one day, Trump threatened the use of mass government violence inside the United States, asserted that kids are getting secret medical procedures at schools, and promised to lock up his political opponents.”

Now, all of this does not even take into account the incredibly – not to mention dishonest – claim by Trump during the debate the immigrants in Ohio are “eating cats and dogs.”

Enough.

Just send Trump to the trash bin where he belongs and elect Harris.