This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all of my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

As usual, I watched as much as possible of day one of my favorite golf tournament of the year, The Masters.

It was, again, good TV.

But, not the best.

Here are a few day-one perceptions.

ESPN COVERAGE:  One of my friends told me last night that she was disappointed with ESPN coverage. 

Too many talking heads, she said.  Not enough golf, she added.

I agree.

I would have liked to see more golf.  If I wanted talking heads, I would have tuned in to the Golf Channel – as I often do.

I expect that things will improve this weekend when CBS-TV will dominate coverage, with a signature line by commentator host, Jim Nantz – “The Masters – a tradition unlike any other.”

According to Golf Digest, Nantz’ famed catchphrase certainly has a lot of truth to it — because there are plenty of traditions (Champions Dinner, Par 3 Contest, honorary tee shots, concession stand prices that barely change even amid rampant inflation, etc.) associated with the tournament.

So, yeah, it’s a great catchphrase.

One that the tournament trademarked in 2015.  Actually, it’s kind of amazing it took that long.

SPEAKING OF MASTERS’ CATCH PHRASES:  There is another one that makes its way, inevitably, into all TV coverage.

“The Masters doesn’t start until the back nine on Sunday!”

Of course, that’s not technically true.  The Masters actually started yesterday.  But the sentiment is accurate.

The likelihood is that the potential winner won’t emerge until the back nine on Sunday.  But let me just say this – I’ll watch every hole between now and then.

WHERE WAS JUSTIN THOMAS?:  As I watched several hours of TV coverage, I never once saw golf pro Justin Thomas on the screen.

Perhaps that was because he shot four over par.  And I only know that because I had to go on-line to find the Masters’ leaderboard where I saw his name far down the list.

But, in the run-up to the tournament, Thomas was listed as one of the favorites, so there should have been just a bit of coverage of his round one problems.

I also predicted he had a good chance to win the tournament, ending a tough run for him in the majors. 

Still possible, I suppose, but not likely.

WHAT A LIVE MIC CATCHES:  It happens a lot these days, given the understandable bent to catch, not just the pictures of golf, but also the sounds.

But the mics yesterday caught two “f-bombs” being uttered by players after they hit bad shots or got bad breaks.

Bad words happen a lot in life, not just on a golf course.  But, if you are a TV producer of golf, I suspect you don’t like it, but there’s not much you can do about the problem.  Just as is true of what happens in other televised sports.

So it is on to day two.  More memories in a “tradition unlike any other.”

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all of my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

The question in this blog headline is on many of our minds as we anticipate one of the best, if not the best, tournaments of the year, The Masters’.

Some fans may say, or hope, that Tiger Woods could prevail because he has said he intends to play even though he also says he has not fully recovered from a horrendous auto accident a year ago that nearly robbed him of the ability to walk, much less to play golf.

Golf Week Magazine showed up this week with a list of “sleepers” who could have a chance to win.  The list included:

• Shane Lowry, who has a solid short game, enough to win “The Open” (the British Open a couple years ago)

• Tommy Fleetwood, who has knocked on the winning door, but come up short

• Tyrell Hatton, who makes most of his headlines for the anger he shows on the golf course, though he also is a good player (for me, not fun to watch)

• Bubba Watson, who has won the Masters’ twice and always shows up ready to play at his favorite tournament of the year, including when he helps with the “Drive, Chip and Putt” event for budding golfers

• Jon Rahm, who just was replaced in the top ranking spot by…the next player on this list

• Scottie Scheffler, who has become one of my favorite golfers based on his great play, plus stalwart citizenship (I remember seeing him when he played for the University of Texas in the 2015 NCAA National Golf Championship, which was held at Eugene Country Club.  Turned out that the University of Oregon won the title on its home course, but, in the match play finals, Scheffler took down the Ducks’ #1 player, Aaron Wise.)

To this list, I would add:

• Jordan Spieth, who usually plays well at The Masters,” sometimes well enough to win

• Collin Morikawa, who has developed into one of the game’s stars

• Viktor Hovland, who is the only golfer on the PGA Tour, so far at least, from Norway (the homeland of my forbears)

• Dustin Johnson, who is a former champion perhaps rounding into form

So, who is my favorite this year?  Well, not a name on either list above.

I think Justin Thomas is in a good position to win, given the overall strength of his game, particularly with his irons.  He also has an ability to play in tough weather conditions, which could be the case at Augusta National this year.

For Thomas, the question always revolves around his putter.  If he is on, watch out.

He showed golf fans a lot when he played in the recent Players Championship and almost emerged as the winner.  On the bad-weather Saturday of that tournament in Florida, Thomas displayed great touch with his driver, 3-metal, and long-irons that almost defied belief. 

He hit into the wind with verve, vigor and aggression.  Most of those competing against him did not.

Will this translate to the Masters’? 

Of course, no one knows, but, if I was betting on golf tournaments – and I do not – I would place money on Thomas.  Besides, he’s fun to watch with none other than the great caddie, Bones McKay, on his bag.  [I add that it will be unusual not to see McKay’s previous Phil Mickelson in the field this year.  I continue to hope he finds a way to restore his reputation because he is good for golf.]

By his own admission, a win for Thomas would help him rise above past major-tournament failures. 

To me, it also would be a win for the ages because I am a Thomas fan.

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all of my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

Links Magazine shows up today with another solid on-line contribution.

It lists what it calls, properly so from my vantage, the five best Masters’ highlights over the life of the tournament, which starts later this week in Augusta, Georgia.

Unfortunately, the way Links publishes its on-line version makes it impossible for me to copy the story and share it with family and friends.  So, from my memory, here are the five highlights, in order, from fifth to first:

5.  BEN CRENSHAW WINS HIS SECOND GREEN JACKET

Only a couple days after returning to Augusta National from the funeral of his long-time friend and golf mentor, Harvey Penick, Crenshaw persevered.  He was overcome with emotion on the 18^th hole when he sank a putt to take the victory, even as he fell into the arms of his usual Masters’ caddie, Carl Jackson.

LARRY MIZE CHIPS IN FOR AN UNPREDICTABLE VICTORY

When he tied two other more famous players – Seve Ballesteros and Greg Norman – for the lead after the fourth round, no one would have expected Mize to win in the playoff.

Then, he did the amazing, which is still fun to watch.  He chipped in from a terrible lie on the 11^th hole, thus denying Norman a Masters’ win, which he never got.  [By the way, Ballesteros already has gone out of the playoff after three-putting on the 1^st hole.]

TIGER WOODS WINS HIS FIFTH GREEN JACKET

Against long odds, Woods played in 2019 – and, with his family in the 18^th hole gallery – won his fifth Masters,’ prompting hugs all around after, incredibly, he prevailed.

AND MORE WOODS – IN 1997, HE WINS BY 12 SHOTS

As a 21-year-old, Woods won his first Masters’ by an incredible 12 shots.  And that was after he shot 40 on his first nine holes of the tournament.  At the time, no one knew how would continue to conquer the tournament, even as might set out to do this year as he decides “at game-time” whether to play again.

JACK NICKLAUS LAUNCHES HIMSELF INTO MASTERS’ HISTORY

In 1986, Nicklaus, with son Jackie on his bag as caddie, Nicklaus thrilled the golfing world by winning his sixth green jacket.  Me too!

He was 46 years old!

I still get goose bumps when I see again the TV coverage of his win – for the ages!

So, as I relive in words these five highlights, two questions arrive:  (1) Do you agree that these are the five best highlights and, if not, what are the others?  (2) And, what will be the new highlights in this year’s tournament?

I cannot wait to find out later this week when I am glued to the TV coverage — and communicating with my daughter by phone as we connect in our favorite golf tournament of the year, even as we sit about 1,000 miles away from each other.

For the Masters,’ distance doesn’t matter!

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all of my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

It’s Masters’ week!

Nothing more needs to be said.

But here I go anyway.

As I anticipate watching my favorite professional golf tournament of the year next week, two unusual questions are being asked this year.

They are:

• Will Phil Mickelson, who has won three times, change his mind and decide he wants to play this year after fomenting so much controversy over his dalliance with the budding rival golf league involving a terrorist state – Saudi Arabia?

The answer is “no.”

• Will several-time champion Tiger Woods decide to play, even though he says he has not fully recovered from a horrific automobile accident a couple years ago?

The possible answer is “yes.”

The fact that Mickelson will not play is good for the Masters.  If he was on site, he would become a focal point, at least for the media, and that would end up detracting from a golf tournament which makes headlines on good play from those who participate, as well as on how well it organizes one of golf’s crown jewels.

As for Woods, he has said previously that he does not yet have the physical capacity or endurance to walk four full rounds on a golf course, including Augusta National.

But this story appeared on-line from the Southern California Golf Association:

“Tiger Woods is set to take a trip down to Augusta National in the coming days to walk the course before deciding whether to play at The Masters.

“As things stand, the 15-time major champion is still in the field for the famous tournament which he sensationally won in 2019.  As per the official Masters’ website, his name and picture are still on the list.”

And, yesterday, Woods, in fact, did walk the course and said his decision on whether to play would be made at game-time.

For my part, I decline to focus on each of the questions listed above.  Instead, I will get ready for this great tournament by:

• Getting my official Masters’ chair (at least I will do so in my mind because the chair is back home in Salem, Oregon while I am in La Quinta, California)
• Getting get my official Masters’ coffee mug (same issue; the mug is back in Oregon)
• Calling back and forth with my daughter as she watches the tournament in Woodinville, Washington, and I watch in La Quinta

It’s a great father-daughter experience no matter how far away geographically we are from each other. 

We love to share the Masters’ experience, which we were fortunate enough to have on-site in 2015 and now repeat each year from our homes in the Northwest.

Back in 2015, we arrived in Augusta on a Wednesday to watch the par 3 contest and a few other practice-round shots.  In the stands for the par 3 contest on hole #6, we watched Masters’ member Condolezza Rice welcome players to that tee.

And, from afar, we heard the cheers when Jack Nicklaus made a hole-in-one on hole #4.

Many pros walked over from several holes away to congratulate Nicklaus on his feat.  [By the way, he has announced that age will deflect from playing any more in the par 3 contest.]

After the first round, we made it home to watch the final two rounds in TV.

The Masters is my favorite tournament to watch all year long.  Every other year, the Ryder Cup might come close.  But the Masters’ remains.

Great memories for a lifetime!

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all of my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

This issue – the urban-rural divide –is alive and well in Oregon. 

It was back when I worked in state government in the late 1980s.  It is today.

There are at least two aspects of this divide.  One is that it is real.  Urban issues are different than rural issues.  Rural issues are different than urban issues.

The second is that the divide is often perceived as a political issue.  It is assumed that those who represent urban areas don’t understand rural realities.  The reverse also is true.

The nexus of the issue often rests in the Oregon Legislature.  To the consternation of those from rural areas in the state, leaders of the Legislature in Salem almost always hail from urban Oregon.

And, often, they don’t understand rural issues and, on occasion, also give the appearance of not caring.

Given the make-up of the Legislature – heavily weighted toward urban areas – those who represent rural areas often have difficulty rising to positions of leadership.

One of the best examples of the urban-rural divide occurred in the gubernatorial election back in2010.  Republican political newcomer, Chris Dudley, then having just retired from a stint in professional basketball with the Portland Trailblazers, took on Democrat veteran John Kitzhaber.

The result?

Kitzhaber won with 51 per cent of the vote.

But, Dudley won 29 of Oregon’s 36 counties, most of them rural.  Kitzhaber prevailed when late Multnomah and Lane County votes, the vast majority of them Democrat votes, pushed him over the top.

For my part, I often encountered the urban-rural divide when I served as deputy director of the Oregon Economic Development Department, now called Business Oregon.

This reality persisted:  It was easier to help businesses locate or expand in urban Oregon than in rural Oregon.  That is a harsh reality of the split, not a testament to political differences of the sort that marked the Kitzhaber-Dudley gubernatorial race.

So, what to do about the divide?

Well, it turns out one man is on a quest to conquer it, or at least understand more about it.

That man is Les Zaitz, a veteran Oregon journalist who runs rural newspapers and a digital news service. 

According to a blog on my old company’s website (CFM Advocates), Zaitz is on a mission to find out what Oregonians think about the urban-rural divide and what they want from their next governor.  He teamed up with Rural Development Initiatives and the Agora Journalism Center in Portland to conduct four hour-long virtual listening sessions with participants from all corners of the state.  The Pamplin group of newspapers and Jefferson Public Radio in Southern Oregon also assisted.

Zaitz has been an award-winning journalist in Oregon for 45 years, much of it covering state affairs.  He now lives on a ranch located in a national forest in Northeast Oregon and runs rural newspapers and the digital news service, Oregon Capital Chronicle, which, among other things, publishes Salem Reporter.

As an investigative reporter, Zaitz covered stories about Mexican drug cartels, corrupt legislators, a major bank failure, and phony charities.

Among his findings so far:

• Oregon voters are hungry for someone who can look past party affiliation to unite the state. That’s the view of 41 per cent of non-affiliated Oregon voters, who now make up the largest percentage of the state’s electorate as registration for both Democrats and Republicans has declined.
• “These citizens are worn out by the focus on party over performance,” Zaitz writes. “They recognize the impact – in Oregon and across the United States – of Republicans and Democrats treating each other like the enemy. For these voters, those party affiliations seem to be more about who has power, not who is doing best for Oregon.”
• Zaitz’ story includes a handful of quotes from listening session participants:

“Bipartisanship is hugely important, especially considering how much rural communities, low-income communities and communities of color have in common,” Angela Uherbelau said in an email after one session. “A governor who brings Democrats and Republicans together to solve our literacy and math crisis in Oregon would transform the state for years to come.”

“It’s important for the next governor to act in an apolitical, inclusive and constructive manner,” wrote Daniel Bachhuber. “These days, it seems like there is very little working across the aisle. Instead, it’s mostly attacks across the aisle.”

Ginger Savage wrote, “The last two years have shown us that no one party has the right answers to everything. Through the process of discussion and compromise, Oregonians’ lives will be better. The governor must rebuild so much trust, communication, compromise.”

“My hope for a bipartisan leader is that they will emphasize entertaining solutions and ideas representing all sides and viewpoints,” said Claire Conklin, noting that “our state and our country continue to move further apart.”

“We are at a pivotal time in our state, when we can either continue to see further division or begin to realize some unity,” Charlie Mitchell wrote. “This is a deep and wide divide and will not be resolved quickly or easily … I have little faith in the major parties as they are currently structured. I don’t believe the two major parties are serving us well at the state or national level.”

These, the blog went on, are the kinds of persons who think the next governor would learn a thing or two in far corners of Oregon that could be shared elsewhere – even in the cities.

More from my old company’s blog:

Listening sessions confirmed Oregonians in rural area believe the urban-rural divide is real and impacts their daily lives.  “This wasn’t some political talking point from rural politicians,” Zaitz observed.  “This wasn’t some rabid table-pounding demand to be cut loose to shift to Idaho. They live the divide every day in their communities.”

The divide manifests itself, according to listening session participants, in a lack of opportunity and short shrift on state funding.

“They see their communities as capable of solving their own problems,” Zaitz wrote.  “No one wanted the next governor to ride into town with saddle bags stuffed with solutions.  They want a governor to understand the real distinctions of rural life ­– why it is attractive for many, how its cadence differs from urban areas.”

“Several speakers remarked that rural communities are particularly skilled at addressing community needs” Zaitz said.  “’Resilient’ was one description applied several times.  By that, they seemed to mean that they were willing to do the work needed to fix whatever needed fixing.  They just needed a few more of the tools that urban areas get to do so.  They want the next governor to deliver.”

No one wanted the next governor to ride into town with saddle bags stuffed with solutions.  They want a governor to understand the real distinctions of rural life ­– why it is attractive for many, how its cadence differs from urban areas.

Their hope is Oregon’s next governor will “listen to them”, including getting out of Salem to meet with them on their home rural turf.  “They want genuine engagement, not just a whistle-stop tour through a Rotary Club luncheon or a contrived community meeting,” Zaitz said.

For my part, I wish Zaitz and his allies success in understanding the urban-rural divide.  It won’t go away, but it can be better understood.

I have worked with Zaitz over the years, especially when I represented state agencies in dealing the media, including Zaitz.  He always was fair, open and honest, critical qualities for his new venture – understanding the urban-rural divide.

I am rooting for success in his new quest, for success will benefit all of Oregon.

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all of my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

I have written before about the phrase in the headline.  It applies especially to politics these days.

Not to the appropriate differences of opinion between Democrats and Republicans – or Independents.  Differing views are a natural part of the political process, though one hopes that smart legislators would find a way, at least on occasion, to bridge differences and find middle ground.

But there are stupid folks on all sides of the political aisle.

So it was that I read another good column by Peggy Noonan in the Wall Street Journal.

Here is a key excerpt:

“Connected are Ginni Thomas’s texts to White House chief of staff Mark Meadows in the days after the 2020 election.  They capture two characteristics of radicals on both sides, now and maybe forever.

“The first is that they have extreme respect for their own emotions:  If they feel it, it’s true.  The other is that they tend to be stupid, in the sense of having little or no historical knowledge or the sense of proportion such knowledge brings.”

Ginni Thomas is the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and made service difficult for him by getting heavily involved in efforts to promote the fallacy that Donald Trump won the most recent presidential election.

Note the phrase, “If they feel it, it’s true.”

That’s a key problem in politics, if not life in general, these days.  If you believe something, then it’s true, regardless of the facts of the matter that, if considered, could prompt you to re-think your biases. 

Back to the headline in this blog:  You can’t fix stupid.

Ginni Thomas is only the latest example of it.

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all of my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

The last census created a new congressional district in Oregon.  For now, that’s all we know.

Why?

The new district, without a well-financed incumbent, has drawn a mad rush of candidates.  Sixteen in all.

So, the votes in the primary and general elections, especially on the Democrat side, will be spread among so many candidates that there is no way to peg favorites.

Here is the way the Oregonian newspaper summarized the status:

“It’s been four decades since Oregon had a congressional race quite like this one:  A brand new seat, fresh for the taking.

“With 16 entrants, the primary races to represent Oregon’s newly created 6th District have attracted more candidates than those for any other seat in the state.  In fact, there are more people running in the 6th than in the Portland area’s three other U.S. House seats combined.”

Awarded to Oregon during the re-apportionment process that followed the 2020 census, the 6th District stretches from the southwest Portland suburbs to farming communities in Yamhill and Polk Counties.  The eastern border parallels Interstate 5 south to Salem and pulls in Willamette Valley towns such as Woodburn and Keizer.

It includes the state Capitol, where three members of the Legislature each hope the new congressional district will allow them to reach to become legislators in Washington, D.C.

At 1,900 square miles, the 6th District is the second-smallest in the state in physical size.  And while the redistricting process created districts with very nearly the same populations, the 6th has the fewest number of registered voters, according to the Oregon Secretary of State’s office.

More than 40 per cent of those 466,183 voters are neither Democrat nor Republican, and, thus, won’t have a say in the May primary.  Of the rest, Democrats outnumber Republicans by more than 26,000.

For me, a basic question is why anyone would want to win. 

That’s because the reality is that the winner will have to find a new home in D.C., plus get on a plane twice a month to make it back to Oregon.  And, once that person lands in Portland, he or she would have to drive around the district to meet voters.

Plus, in D.C., the winner would be a back-bencher in a U.S. House led either by Speaker Nancy Pelosi or Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy, the latter of whom navigates every day to build a resume for the top job.

See!  Quite a plum job as a new Member of Congress.

Two potential leaders in the 6^th District sweepstakes are Democrats Teresa Alonso Leon and Andrea Salinas, both of whom served in the Legislature.  If elected, either would be Oregon’s first Latina member of Congress.

Another candidate, Dr. Kathleen Harder, adds an element of local interest in the race for me and others who live in Salem. 

A primary care physician, Harder also serves on the Oregon Medical Board.  She is a neighbor of mine where our friendship has been cemented by our joint interest in politics at both local and national levels.

She said her focus is “ensuring quality, affordable health care for everyone, expanding access to mental health providers, tackling homelessness, working for stable and affordable housing, and addressing the climate crisis.”

She will be a long-shot to prevail in the heavily-contested primary, but I admire her willingness to give it a try.

On the Republican side, the leading candidate appears to be state Representative Ron Noble of McMinnville, the city’s retired police chief who is finishing up his third term in the Oregon House.

As an independent, I don’t get to vote in the primary.  But, as a political junkie, I’ll be paying attention to who emerges from this crowded field and the likelihood is that winner, if a D, would go on to take the general election. 

Don’t tell Ron Noble I said that.